Understand the 12 axes
Leaning Multiculturalism: Immigration
27.6–42.5% Assimilation · 57.5–72.4% Multiculturalism
What this band means
Leaning Multiculturalism covers 27.6–42.5% Assimilation. Your answers favor Multiculturalism, with a moderate preference in this part of the questionnaire. Assimilation emphasizes a shared national language, cultural adaptation and a common public identity. Multiculturalism emphasizes the coexistence of different traditions, languages and identities, together with a more welcoming approach to migration. The axis is not a direct measurement of prejudice, public safety or international trade. A single percentage cannot describe a person’s treatment of individual migrants. This band describes the direction and distance of your score from the center, rather than the percentage of people who agree with you. Two people in the same band can still disagree on particular policies. Their remaining eleven axes may also differ substantially. Use the sample statements to identify the trade-offs that produced this part of your result. The catalog examples below offer points of comparison within the model; they are not a survey of quiz participants.
Across the reference catalog
These 186 profiles are reference models, not responses from quiz participants. The distributions describe this catalog’s composition.
Among 46 ideologies, the median Immigration score is 33.8% Assimilation. The lowest value is 28.1% (Effective Accelerationism), while the highest is 42.5% (Third Way). These values describe the reference set on this particular axis.
Among 43 countries and regions, the median Immigration score is 36.2% Assimilation. The lowest value is 28.7% (Vatican City), while the highest is 42.5% (Mongol Empire). These values describe the reference set on this particular axis.
Among 97 figures, the median Immigration score is 36.2% Assimilation. The lowest value is 28% (Genghis Khan), while the highest is 42.5% (Pablo Marçal). These values describe the reference set on this particular axis.
Examples in this band
Brazilian Social Democracy

European Union

South Africa

Soviet Union (USSR)

Ireland

Allende's Chile

Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)

Dalai Lama (Tenzin Gyatso)

Eduardo Leite
How the other axes combine
These are medians for reference profiles in this band. They do not predict the other views of a person with this result.
Among the 186 profiles in Leaning Multiculturalism, Structure has a median of 41.2% Federal and 58.8% Unitary.
Among the 186 profiles in Leaning Multiculturalism, Representation has a median of 73.8% Democracy and 26.2% Autocracy.
Among the 186 profiles in Leaning Multiculturalism, Power has a median of 41.2% Security and 58.8% Liberty.
Among the 186 profiles in Leaning Multiculturalism, Diplomacy has a median of 31.9% Militarist and 68.1% Pacifist.
Among the 186 profiles in Leaning Multiculturalism, Intervention has a median of 59.45% Non-interventionist and 40.5% Nationalist.
Among the 186 profiles in Leaning Multiculturalism, Economy has a median of 55% Public and 45% Private.
Among the 186 profiles in Leaning Multiculturalism, Control has a median of 53.15% Planning and 46.9% Free market.
Among the 186 profiles in Leaning Multiculturalism, Trade has a median of 36.9% Protectionism and 63.1% Globalism.
Among the 186 profiles in Leaning Multiculturalism, Religion has a median of 60% Irreligious and 40% Religious.
Among the 186 profiles in Leaning Multiculturalism, Morality has a median of 56.2% Progressive and 43.8% Traditionalist.
Among the 186 profiles in Leaning Multiculturalism, Technology has a median of 57.25% Technology and 42.8% Biology.
Consider the questions
01Those who immigrate to a country should learn the language and adopt local customs.
02I support closing the borders to immigration to preserve the country's cultural identity.
03A multicultural society should embrace several languages in everyday life.
Explore the seven bands
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.