Understand the 12 axes
Leaning Security: Power
57.5–72.4% Security · 27.599999999999994–42.5% Liberty
What this band means
Leaning Security covers 57.5–72.4% Security. Your answers favor Security, with a moderate preference in this part of the questionnaire. Security gives greater weight to public order, enforcement and state intervention in civil life. Liberty gives greater weight to privacy, personal autonomy, expression and limits on coercion. These priorities can conflict when policies promise collective protection at an individual cost. This is a civil-power axis. It does not directly measure government spending or determine whether public services should be privately owned. This band describes the direction and distance of your score from the center, rather than the percentage of people who agree with you. Two people in the same band can still disagree on particular policies. Their remaining eleven axes may also differ substantially. Use the sample statements to identify the trade-offs that produced this part of your result. The catalog examples below offer points of comparison within the model; they are not a survey of quiz participants.
Across the reference catalog
These 175 profiles are reference models, not responses from quiz participants. The distributions describe this catalog’s composition.
Among 46 ideologies, the median Power score is 66.25% Security. The lowest value is 57.5% (Financial Monarchism), while the highest is 71.9% (Archeofuturism). These values describe the reference set on this particular axis.
Among 39 countries and regions, the median Power score is 63.9% Security. The lowest value is 58% (Gran Colombia), while the highest is 72.2% (Senegal). These values describe the reference set on this particular axis.
Among 90 figures, the median Power score is 65.6% Security. The lowest value is 57.5% (Leon Kass), while the highest is 72.2% (Viktor Orbán). These values describe the reference set on this particular axis.
Examples in this band
How the other axes combine
These are medians for reference profiles in this band. They do not predict the other views of a person with this result.
Among the 175 profiles in Leaning Security, Structure has a median of 27.5% Federal and 72.5% Unitary.
Among the 175 profiles in Leaning Security, Representation has a median of 47.5% Democracy and 52.5% Autocracy.
Among the 175 profiles in Leaning Security, Immigration has a median of 64.8% Assimilation and 35.2% Multiculturalism.
Among the 175 profiles in Leaning Security, Diplomacy has a median of 56.4% Militarist and 43.6% Pacifist.
Among the 175 profiles in Leaning Security, Intervention has a median of 38.8% Non-interventionist and 61.2% Nationalist.
Among the 175 profiles in Leaning Security, Economy has a median of 48.8% Public and 51.2% Private.
Among the 175 profiles in Leaning Security, Control has a median of 56.9% Planning and 43.1% Free market.
Among the 175 profiles in Leaning Security, Trade has a median of 52.5% Protectionism and 47.5% Globalism.
Among the 175 profiles in Leaning Security, Religion has a median of 32.5% Irreligious and 67.5% Religious.
Among the 175 profiles in Leaning Security, Morality has a median of 31.2% Progressive and 68.8% Traditionalist.
Among the 175 profiles in Leaning Security, Technology has a median of 57.5% Technology and 42.5% Biology.
Consider the questions
01Aggressive police operations should be used against crime in areas controlled by criminal groups.
02The state should be allowed to monitor digital conversations to prevent and combat crime.
03Adult cannabis use should not be a criminal offense.
Explore the seven bands
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.