Political leader
Anders Fogh Rasmussen
Liberal Prime Minister of Denmark (2001–2009) and later Secretary General of NATO (2009–2014), Rasmussen combined market reforms with the Nordic welfare state, championing free trade, European integration, and secular, progressive values.
Image: Foto: Magnus Fröderberg derivative work: Colin · CC BY 2.5 dk · Wikimedia Commons · cropped and resized
Statesman · 1953–
Profile is a model built from 240 answers simulated in character; not a statement by the person.
Compare your own views01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
45.5pt
Trade
16.2% Protectionism, compared with the ideology catalog’s 61.7% median.
How open should the economy be to international exchange?
32.5pt
Control
30% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.
How should economic activity be coordinated?
26.3pt
Morality
68.8% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.
Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 45% Federal, 55% Unitary (Balanced); Representation: 73.8% Democracy, 26.2% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Anders Fogh Rasmussen sits 16.3 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 43.8% Security, 56.2% Liberty (Balanced); Immigration: 46.2% Assimilation, 53.8% Multiculturalism (Balanced). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Anders Fogh Rasmussen sits 15.0 points below it. 128 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 53.8% Militarist, 46.2% Pacifist (Balanced); Intervention: 31.2% Non-interventionist, 68.8% Nationalist (Leaning Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Anders Fogh Rasmussen sits 17.6 points below it. 187 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 35% Public, 65% Private (Leaning Private); Control: 30% Planning, 70% Free market (Leaning Free market); Trade: 16.2% Protectionism, 83.8% Globalism (Strong Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Anders Fogh Rasmussen depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Anders Fogh Rasmussen sits 18.2 points below it. 179 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 65% Irreligious, 35% Religious (Leaning Irreligious); Morality: 68.8% Progressive, 31.2% Traditionalist (Leaning Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Anders Fogh Rasmussen sits 30.0 points above it. 151 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 61.3% Technology, 38.7% Biology (Leaning Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the 11.3-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Anders Fogh Rasmussen sits 3.8 points above it. 299 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles
Reza Pahlavi
96.8% compatibility
Adrian Wooldridge
95.7% compatibility
Boris Johnson
94.5% compatibility
Mark Zuckerberg
94.4% compatibility
Jeff Bezos
94.2% compatibility
Mark Carney
94.2% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest ideologies
Closest countries & regions
Three views of compatibility
Political
Third Way
95.4%
12 axes considered
Social
Ordoliberalism
98%
9 axes considered
Economic
Liberal Technocracy
99.7%
3 axes considered
Got Anders Fogh Rasmussen on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Anders Fogh Rasmussen on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Anders Fogh Rasmussen.
Which ideology is closest to Anders Fogh Rasmussen?
Third Way has 95.4% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Anders Fogh Rasmussen?
Trade is among the furthest from the center: 16.2% Protectionism and 83.8% Globalism. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.