Third Position

Clerical Fascism

A variant of fascism that fuses ultranationalism, a mass party and militias with the authority of a national Church, with clergy in power, as in Dollfuss's Austrofascism, Father Tiso's Slovakia, the Croatian Ustaše and Romania's Iron Guard.

I want a nation consecrated by the Church, with clergy in government, one party, faith militias and Christian corporations running the economy.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 17.5%82.5% Unitary
Democracy 15%85% Autocracy
Security 93.3%6.7% Liberty
Assimilation 99.1%0.9% Multiculturalism
Militarist 95.7%4.3% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 12.6%87.4% Nationalist
Public 75.7%24.3% Private
Planning 85%15% Free market
Protectionism 88.7%11.3% Globalism
Irreligious 1%99% Religious
Progressive 5.3%94.7% Traditionalist
Technology 28.6%71.4% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

57.2pt

Religion

1% Irreligious, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.2% median.

What place should religion have in individual and public life?

50.5pt

Diplomacy

95.7% Militarist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 45.25% median.

When is armed force an appropriate political instrument?

49.3pt

Immigration

99.1% Assimilation, compared with the ideology catalog’s 49.75% median.

How should a society approach migration and cultural difference?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 17.5% Federal, 82.5% Unitary (Strong Unitary); Representation: 15% Democracy, 85% Autocracy (Strong Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Clerical Fascism sits 42.5 points below it. 156 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 93.3% Security, 6.7% Liberty (Very strong Security); Immigration: 99.1% Assimilation, 0.9% Multiculturalism (Very strong Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Clerical Fascism sits 34.5 points above it. 95 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 95.7% Militarist, 4.3% Pacifist (Very strong Militarist); Intervention: 12.6% Non-interventionist, 87.4% Nationalist (Strong Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Clerical Fascism sits 36.2 points below it. 144 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 75.7% Public, 24.3% Private (Strong Public); Control: 85% Planning, 15% Free market (Strong Planning); Trade: 88.7% Protectionism, 11.3% Globalism (Very strong Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Clerical Fascism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Clerical Fascism sits 22.5 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 1% Irreligious, 99% Religious (Very strong Religious); Morality: 5.3% Progressive, 94.7% Traditionalist (Very strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Clerical Fascism sits 33.5 points below it. 116 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 28.6% Technology, 71.4% Biology (Leaning Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Clerical Fascism, the 21.4-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Clerical Fascism sits 28.9 points below it. 117 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Clerical Fascism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Clerical Fascism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Clerical Fascism.

Which ideology is closest to Clerical Fascism?

Fourth Political Theory has 96.2% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Clerical Fascism?

Immigration is among the furthest from the center: 99.1% Assimilation and 0.9% Multiculturalism. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test