Left
Indigenism
Current that values indigenous peoples and their rights, defending autonomy, territory, culture, and political participation, along with development models and a plurinational state that respect their traditions.
I want a plurinational society that respects the territory, autonomy and traditions of indigenous peoples, with their full political participation.Compare your own views
01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
42.5pt
Structure
80% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.
Where should public power live?
41.3pt
Morality
83.8% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.
Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?
39.1pt
Technology
18.8% Technology, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.9% median.
How readily should technology reshape human life?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 80% Federal, 20% Unitary (Strong Federal); Representation: 90% Democracy, 10% Autocracy (Very strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Indigenism sits 32.5 points above it. 44 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 28.7% Security, 71.3% Liberty (Leaning Liberty); Immigration: 21.2% Assimilation, 78.8% Multiculturalism (Strong Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Indigenism sits 30.1 points below it. 151 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 10% Militarist, 90% Pacifist (Very strong Pacifist); Intervention: 82.5% Non-interventionist, 17.5% Nationalist (Strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Indigenism sits 33.7 points above it. 105 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 83.8% Public, 16.2% Private (Strong Public); Control: 80% Planning, 20% Free market (Strong Planning); Trade: 67.5% Protectionism, 32.5% Globalism (Leaning Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Indigenism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Indigenism sits 30.6 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 68.8% Irreligious, 31.2% Religious (Leaning Irreligious); Morality: 83.8% Progressive, 16.2% Traditionalist (Strong Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Indigenism sits 45.0 points above it. 103 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 18.8% Technology, 81.2% Biology (Strong Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Indigenism, the 31.2-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Indigenism sits 38.7 points below it. 60 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles
Eco-Socialism
97.4% compatibility
Syndicalism
97.2% compatibility
Deep Ecology
97.1% compatibility
Zapatismo
96.8% compatibility
Luxemburgist Socialism
96.6% compatibility
Libertarian Socialism
95% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest countries & regions
Closest political figures
Associated references
Got Indigenism on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Indigenism on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Indigenism.
Which ideology is closest to Indigenism?
Eco-Socialism has 97.4% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Indigenism?
Representation is among the furthest from the center: 90% Democracy and 10% Autocracy. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.







