Left

Indigenism

Current that values indigenous peoples and their rights, defending autonomy, territory, culture, and political participation, along with development models and a plurinational state that respect their traditions.

I want a plurinational society that respects the territory, autonomy and traditions of indigenous peoples, with their full political participation.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 80%20% Unitary
Democracy 90%10% Autocracy
Security 28.7%71.3% Liberty
Assimilation 21.2%78.8% Multiculturalism
Militarist 10%90% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 82.5%17.5% Nationalist
Public 83.8%16.2% Private
Planning 80%20% Free market
Protectionism 67.5%32.5% Globalism
Irreligious 68.8%31.2% Religious
Progressive 83.8%16.2% Traditionalist
Technology 18.8%81.2% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

42.5pt

Structure

80% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.

Where should public power live?

41.3pt

Morality

83.8% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.

Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?

39.1pt

Technology

18.8% Technology, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.9% median.

How readily should technology reshape human life?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 80% Federal, 20% Unitary (Strong Federal); Representation: 90% Democracy, 10% Autocracy (Very strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Indigenism sits 32.5 points above it. 44 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 28.7% Security, 71.3% Liberty (Leaning Liberty); Immigration: 21.2% Assimilation, 78.8% Multiculturalism (Strong Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Indigenism sits 30.1 points below it. 151 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 10% Militarist, 90% Pacifist (Very strong Pacifist); Intervention: 82.5% Non-interventionist, 17.5% Nationalist (Strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Indigenism sits 33.7 points above it. 105 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 83.8% Public, 16.2% Private (Strong Public); Control: 80% Planning, 20% Free market (Strong Planning); Trade: 67.5% Protectionism, 32.5% Globalism (Leaning Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Indigenism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Indigenism sits 30.6 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 68.8% Irreligious, 31.2% Religious (Leaning Irreligious); Morality: 83.8% Progressive, 16.2% Traditionalist (Strong Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Indigenism sits 45.0 points above it. 103 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 18.8% Technology, 81.2% Biology (Strong Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Indigenism, the 31.2-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Indigenism sits 38.7 points below it. 60 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Indigenism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Indigenism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Indigenism.

Which ideology is closest to Indigenism?

Eco-Socialism has 97.4% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Indigenism?

Representation is among the furthest from the center: 90% Democracy and 10% Autocracy. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test