Far-Right

Right-Wing Accelerationism

Current that advocates accelerating the system's contradictions through technology and the collapse of liberal institutions, betting on the rupture of the existing order to forge a new social and political hierarchy.

I want to accelerate the collapse of liberal institutions with technology and stateless markets, so a new hierarchy rises from the ruins.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 74.4%25.6% Unitary
Democracy 19.8%80.2% Autocracy
Security 42.4%57.6% Liberty
Assimilation 79.3%20.7% Multiculturalism
Militarist 82.6%17.4% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 36.4%63.6% Nationalist
Public 23.2%76.8% Private
Planning 21.8%78.2% Free market
Protectionism 29.1%70.9% Globalism
Irreligious 78.9%21.1% Religious
Progressive 32.1%67.9% Traditionalist
Technology 93.7%6.3% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

40.7pt

Control

21.8% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.

How should economic activity be coordinated?

39.0pt

Representation

19.8% Democracy, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.8% median.

Who should govern, and how should they be accountable?

37.3pt

Diplomacy

82.6% Militarist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 45.25% median.

When is armed force an appropriate political instrument?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 74.4% Federal, 25.6% Unitary (Strong Federal); Representation: 19.8% Democracy, 80.2% Autocracy (Strong Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Right-Wing Accelerationism sits 37.7 points below it. 156 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 42.4% Security, 57.6% Liberty (Leaning Liberty); Immigration: 79.3% Assimilation, 20.7% Multiculturalism (Strong Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Right-Wing Accelerationism sits 16.4 points below it. 151 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 82.6% Militarist, 17.4% Pacifist (Strong Militarist); Intervention: 36.4% Non-interventionist, 63.6% Nationalist (Leaning Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Right-Wing Accelerationism sits 12.4 points below it. 187 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 23.2% Public, 76.8% Private (Strong Private); Control: 21.8% Planning, 78.2% Free market (Strong Free market); Trade: 29.1% Protectionism, 70.9% Globalism (Leaning Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Right-Wing Accelerationism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Right-Wing Accelerationism sits 30.0 points below it. 74 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 78.9% Irreligious, 21.1% Religious (Strong Irreligious); Morality: 32.1% Progressive, 67.9% Traditionalist (Leaning Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Right-Wing Accelerationism sits 6.7 points below it. 197 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 93.7% Technology, 6.3% Biology (Very strong Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Right-Wing Accelerationism, the 43.7-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Right-Wing Accelerationism sits 36.2 points above it. 19 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

At the other end of the catalog

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Right-Wing Accelerationism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Right-Wing Accelerationism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Right-Wing Accelerationism.

Which ideology is closest to Right-Wing Accelerationism?

Dark Enlightenment has 97.4% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Right-Wing Accelerationism?

Technology is among the furthest from the center: 93.7% Technology and 6.3% Biology. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test