Right

Right-Wing Pragmatism

Pragmatic branch that prioritizes fiscal adjustment, economic stability, and governability through broad coalitions, accepting market reforms and political concessions in the name of short- and medium-term results.

I want governability through a broad coalition, with fiscal adjustment and market reforms accepted in exchange for stability and quick results.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 35%65% Unitary
Democracy 56.2%43.8% Autocracy
Security 56.2%43.8% Liberty
Assimilation 52.5%47.5% Multiculturalism
Militarist 42.5%57.5% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 42.5%57.5% Nationalist
Public 31.2%68.8% Private
Planning 36.2%63.8% Free market
Protectionism 33.8%66.2% Globalism
Irreligious 43.8%56.2% Religious
Progressive 42.5%57.5% Traditionalist
Technology 66.2%33.8% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

27.9pt

Trade

33.8% Protectionism, compared with the ideology catalog’s 61.7% median.

How open should the economy be to international exchange?

26.3pt

Economy

31.2% Public, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.5% median.

Who should own productive assets and provide essential services?

26.3pt

Control

36.2% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.

How should economic activity be coordinated?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 35% Federal, 65% Unitary (Leaning Unitary); Representation: 56.2% Democracy, 43.8% Autocracy (Balanced). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Right-Wing Pragmatism sits 1.3 points below it. 80 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 56.2% Security, 43.8% Liberty (Balanced); Immigration: 52.5% Assimilation, 47.5% Multiculturalism (Balanced). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Right-Wing Pragmatism sits 2.6 points below it. 128 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 42.5% Militarist, 57.5% Pacifist (Leaning Pacifist); Intervention: 42.5% Non-interventionist, 57.5% Nationalist (Leaning Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Right-Wing Pragmatism sits 6.3 points below it. 187 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 31.2% Public, 68.8% Private (Leaning Private); Control: 36.2% Planning, 63.8% Free market (Leaning Free market); Trade: 33.8% Protectionism, 66.2% Globalism (Leaning Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Right-Wing Pragmatism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Right-Wing Pragmatism sits 22.0 points below it. 179 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 43.8% Irreligious, 56.2% Religious (Balanced); Morality: 42.5% Progressive, 57.5% Traditionalist (Leaning Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Right-Wing Pragmatism sits 3.7 points above it. 197 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 66.2% Technology, 33.8% Biology (Leaning Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Right-Wing Pragmatism, the 16.2-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Right-Wing Pragmatism sits 8.7 points above it. 299 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

At the other end of the catalog

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Right-Wing Pragmatism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Right-Wing Pragmatism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Right-Wing Pragmatism.

Which ideology is closest to Right-Wing Pragmatism?

Conservative Centrism has 95.3% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Right-Wing Pragmatism?

Economy is among the furthest from the center: 31.2% Public and 68.8% Private. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test