Philosopher
Arthur Schopenhauer
A German philosopher, Schopenhauer saw the blind Will as the irrational essence of reality, a source of perpetual suffering, and advocated compassion, art and ascetic renunciation as the only relief, in a pessimism skeptical of all Enlightenment and political optimism.

Image: Johann Schäfer · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons · cropped and resized
Philosopher · 1788–1860
Profile is a model built from 240 answers simulated in character; not a statement by the person.
Compare your own views01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
36.3pt
Control
26.2% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.
How should economic activity be coordinated?
34.1pt
Technology
23.8% Technology, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.9% median.
How readily should technology reshape human life?
26.3pt
Economy
31.2% Public, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.5% median.
Who should own productive assets and provide essential services?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 25% Federal, 75% Unitary (Strong Unitary); Representation: 35% Democracy, 65% Autocracy (Leaning Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Arthur Schopenhauer sits 22.5 points below it. 99 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 65% Security, 35% Liberty (Leaning Security); Immigration: 66.2% Assimilation, 33.8% Multiculturalism (Leaning Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Arthur Schopenhauer sits 6.2 points above it. 175 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 22.5% Militarist, 77.5% Pacifist (Strong Pacifist); Intervention: 72.5% Non-interventionist, 27.5% Nationalist (Strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Arthur Schopenhauer sits 23.7 points above it. 105 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 31.2% Public, 68.8% Private (Leaning Private); Control: 26.2% Planning, 73.8% Free market (Strong Free market); Trade: 38.8% Protectionism, 61.2% Globalism (Leaning Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Arthur Schopenhauer depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Arthur Schopenhauer sits 22.0 points below it. 179 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 76.2% Irreligious, 23.8% Religious (Strong Irreligious); Morality: 46.2% Progressive, 53.8% Traditionalist (Balanced). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Arthur Schopenhauer sits 7.4 points above it. 107 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 23.8% Technology, 76.2% Biology (Strong Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Arthur Schopenhauer, the 26.2-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Arthur Schopenhauer sits 33.7 points below it. 60 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles

Garrett Hardin
88.9% compatibility

Immanuel Kant
88.8% compatibility

Voltaire
87% compatibility

Joseph Schumpeter
85.4% compatibility

Charles Darwin
84.6% compatibility

Confucius
83% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest ideologies
Closest countries & regions
Three views of compatibility
Political
Kantian Republicanism
88.8%
12 axes considered
Social
Traditionalist Atheism
89.3%
9 axes considered
Economic
Libertarian Authoritarianism
99.4%
3 axes considered
Got Arthur Schopenhauer on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Arthur Schopenhauer on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Arthur Schopenhauer.
Which ideology is closest to Arthur Schopenhauer?
Kantian Republicanism has 88.8% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Arthur Schopenhauer?
Diplomacy is among the furthest from the center: 22.5% Militarist and 77.5% Pacifist. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.



