Theorist
Benjamin Tucker
An American individualist anarchist, Tucker championed a free market without state or monopolies, uniting radical individual freedom and mutualism, and translated the great libertarian thinkers of his time.

Image: Unknown author Unknown author · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons · cropped and resized
Anarchist · 1854–1939
Profile is a model built from 240 answers simulated in character; not a statement by the person.
Compare your own views01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
55.0pt
Structure
92.5% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.
Where should public power live?
53.7pt
Power
1.3% Security, compared with the ideology catalog’s 55% median.
How far should the state reach into everyday life?
53.7pt
Control
8.8% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.
How should economic activity be coordinated?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 92.5% Federal, 7.5% Unitary (Very strong Federal); Representation: 80% Democracy, 20% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Benjamin Tucker sits 22.5 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 1.3% Security, 98.7% Liberty (Very strong Liberty); Immigration: 18.8% Assimilation, 81.2% Multiculturalism (Strong Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Benjamin Tucker sits 57.5 points below it. 62 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 7.5% Militarist, 92.5% Pacifist (Very strong Pacifist); Intervention: 86.3% Non-interventionist, 13.7% Nationalist (Strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Benjamin Tucker sits 37.5 points above it. 105 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 31.3% Public, 68.7% Private (Leaning Private); Control: 8.8% Planning, 91.2% Free market (Very strong Free market); Trade: 11.3% Protectionism, 88.7% Globalism (Very strong Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Benjamin Tucker depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Benjamin Tucker sits 21.9 points below it. 179 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 91.3% Irreligious, 8.7% Religious (Very strong Irreligious); Morality: 82.5% Progressive, 17.5% Traditionalist (Strong Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Benjamin Tucker sits 43.7 points above it. 103 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 65% Technology, 35% Biology (Leaning Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Benjamin Tucker, the 15.0-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Benjamin Tucker sits 7.5 points above it. 299 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles

Samuel Edward Konkin III
98.6% compatibility

Ezra Heywood
98.1% compatibility

Satoshi Nakamoto
97.9% compatibility

Lysander Spooner
97.8% compatibility

John McAfee
96.7% compatibility

Émile Armand
94.5% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest ideologies
Closest countries & regions
Three views of compatibility
Political
Geolibertarianism
98.5%
12 axes considered
Social
Geolibertarianism
98.5%
9 axes considered
Economic
Geolibertarianism
99.5%
3 axes considered
Further reading
1893
Instead of a Book
Find the book ↗Got Benjamin Tucker on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Benjamin Tucker on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Benjamin Tucker.
Which ideology is closest to Benjamin Tucker?
Geolibertarianism has 98.5% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Benjamin Tucker?
Power is among the furthest from the center: 1.3% Security and 98.7% Liberty. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.



