Activist
Ezra Heywood
An American individualist anarchist, Heywood championed a free market without monopolies, the abolition of the state, and the emancipation of women, uniting radical economic freedom with the fight for sexual and civil liberty.

Image: Author not recorded in Commons metadata · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons · cropped and resized
Individualist anarchist · 1829-1893
Profile is a model built from 240 answers simulated in character; not a statement by the person.
Compare your own views01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
61.3pt
Structure
98.8% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.
Where should public power live?
56.2pt
Control
6.3% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.
How should economic activity be coordinated?
52.9pt
Trade
8.8% Protectionism, compared with the ideology catalog’s 61.7% median.
How open should the economy be to international exchange?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 98.8% Federal, 1.2% Unitary (Very strong Federal); Representation: 85% Democracy, 15% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Ezra Heywood sits 27.5 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 3.8% Security, 96.2% Liberty (Very strong Liberty); Immigration: 12.5% Assimilation, 87.5% Multiculturalism (Very strong Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Ezra Heywood sits 55.0 points below it. 62 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 5% Militarist, 95% Pacifist (Very strong Pacifist); Intervention: 96.3% Non-interventionist, 3.7% Nationalist (Very strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Ezra Heywood sits 47.5 points above it. 28 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 26.3% Public, 73.7% Private (Strong Private); Control: 6.3% Planning, 93.7% Free market (Very strong Free market); Trade: 8.8% Protectionism, 91.2% Globalism (Very strong Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Ezra Heywood depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Ezra Heywood sits 26.9 points below it. 74 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 88.8% Irreligious, 11.2% Religious (Very strong Irreligious); Morality: 82.5% Progressive, 17.5% Traditionalist (Strong Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Ezra Heywood sits 43.7 points above it. 103 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 73.8% Technology, 26.2% Biology (Strong Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Ezra Heywood, the 23.8-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Ezra Heywood sits 16.3 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles

Benjamin Tucker
98.1% compatibility

Satoshi Nakamoto
98.1% compatibility

Samuel Edward Konkin III
97.3% compatibility

Lysander Spooner
96.4% compatibility

John McAfee
95.1% compatibility

Murray Rothbard
92.8% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest ideologies
Closest countries & regions
Three views of compatibility
Political
Progressive Libertarianism
99.1%
12 axes considered
Social
Progressive Libertarianism
98.9%
9 axes considered
Economic
Classical Liberalism
98.6%
3 axes considered
Got Ezra Heywood on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Ezra Heywood on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Ezra Heywood.
Which ideology is closest to Ezra Heywood?
Progressive Libertarianism has 99.1% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Ezra Heywood?
Structure is among the furthest from the center: 98.8% Federal and 1.2% Unitary. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.



