Economist

Karl Polanyi

Hungarian economic historian, Polanyi argued in The Great Transformation that land, labour and money are fictitious commodities, and that the self-regulating market generates a protective social countermovement.

Portrait of Karl Polanyi

Image: Unknown author Unknown author · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons · cropped and resized

Economist and economic historian · 1886–1964

Profile is a model built from 240 answers simulated in character; not a statement by the person.

Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 57.5%42.5% Unitary
Democracy 87.5%12.5% Autocracy
Security 38.8%61.2% Liberty
Assimilation 23.8%76.2% Multiculturalism
Militarist 20%80% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 73.8%26.2% Nationalist
Public 83.8%16.2% Private
Planning 76.2%23.8% Free market
Protectionism 73.8%26.2% Globalism
Irreligious 56.2%43.8% Religious
Progressive 75%25% Traditionalist
Technology 28.7%71.3% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

32.5pt

Morality

75% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.

Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?

29.2pt

Technology

28.7% Technology, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.9% median.

How readily should technology reshape human life?

28.7pt

Representation

87.5% Democracy, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.8% median.

Who should govern, and how should they be accountable?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 57.5% Federal, 42.5% Unitary (Leaning Federal); Representation: 87.5% Democracy, 12.5% Autocracy (Very strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Karl Polanyi sits 30.0 points above it. 44 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 38.8% Security, 61.2% Liberty (Leaning Liberty); Immigration: 23.8% Assimilation, 76.2% Multiculturalism (Strong Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Karl Polanyi sits 20.0 points below it. 151 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 20% Militarist, 80% Pacifist (Strong Pacifist); Intervention: 73.8% Non-interventionist, 26.2% Nationalist (Strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Karl Polanyi sits 25.0 points above it. 105 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 83.8% Public, 16.2% Private (Strong Public); Control: 76.2% Planning, 23.8% Free market (Strong Planning); Trade: 73.8% Protectionism, 26.2% Globalism (Strong Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Karl Polanyi depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Karl Polanyi sits 30.6 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 56.2% Irreligious, 43.8% Religious (Balanced); Morality: 75% Progressive, 25% Traditionalist (Strong Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Karl Polanyi sits 36.2 points above it. 103 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 28.7% Technology, 71.3% Biology (Leaning Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Karl Polanyi, the 21.3-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Karl Polanyi sits 28.8 points below it. 117 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest ideologies

Closest countries & regions

Three views of compatibility

Further reading

Got Karl Polanyi on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Karl Polanyi on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Karl Polanyi.

Which ideology is closest to Karl Polanyi?

Environmentalism has 97.7% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Karl Polanyi?

Representation is among the furthest from the center: 87.5% Democracy and 12.5% Autocracy. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test