Right
Agrarianism
Republican tradition that idealizes the small landowning farmer as the basis of civic virtue and liberty, advocating wide distribution of land, limited and decentralized government, and distrust of banks, public debt, industry and large cities.
I want a republic of small farmers who own their land, decentralized and free of banks and public debt, far from factories and cities.Compare your own views
01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
45.0pt
Structure
82.5% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.
Where should public power live?
45.0pt
Control
17.5% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.
How should economic activity be coordinated?
41.7pt
Technology
16.2% Technology, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.9% median.
How readily should technology reshape human life?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 82.5% Federal, 17.5% Unitary (Strong Federal); Representation: 77.5% Democracy, 22.5% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Agrarianism sits 20.0 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 13.8% Security, 86.2% Liberty (Strong Liberty); Immigration: 65% Assimilation, 35% Multiculturalism (Leaning Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Agrarianism sits 45.0 points below it. 87 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 26.2% Militarist, 73.8% Pacifist (Strong Pacifist); Intervention: 78.8% Non-interventionist, 21.2% Nationalist (Strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Agrarianism sits 30.0 points above it. 105 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 37.5% Public, 62.5% Private (Leaning Private); Control: 17.5% Planning, 82.5% Free market (Strong Free market); Trade: 35% Protectionism, 65% Globalism (Leaning Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Agrarianism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Agrarianism sits 15.7 points below it. 179 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 65% Irreligious, 35% Religious (Leaning Irreligious); Morality: 30% Progressive, 70% Traditionalist (Leaning Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Agrarianism sits 8.8 points below it. 197 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 16.2% Technology, 83.8% Biology (Strong Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Agrarianism, the 33.8-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Agrarianism sits 41.3 points below it. 60 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles
Federalism
89% compatibility
Direct Democracy
88.6% compatibility
Proudhonian Mutualism
87.6% compatibility
Anarcho-Distributism
86% compatibility
Mutualism
85% compatibility
Libertarian Conservatism
84.9% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest countries & regions
Closest political figures
Associated references
Got Agrarianism on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Agrarianism on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Agrarianism.
Which ideology is closest to Agrarianism?
Federalism has 89% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Agrarianism?
Power is among the furthest from the center: 13.8% Security and 86.2% Liberty. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.






