Anarchist

Proudhonian Mutualism

Proudhon's original doctrine, denouncing property as theft and advocating free mutual credit, federalism of autonomous communities and possession by use, with strong moral reservations about progress and customs.

I want to abolish property as theft, with free mutual credit and a federation of autonomous communes where possession comes from use.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 96.2%3.8% Unitary
Democracy 82.5%17.5% Autocracy
Security 13.8%86.2% Liberty
Assimilation 68.8%31.2% Multiculturalism
Militarist 17.5%82.5% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 81.2%18.8% Nationalist
Public 72.5%27.5% Private
Planning 40%60% Free market
Protectionism 70%30% Globalism
Irreligious 80%20% Religious
Progressive 17.5%82.5% Traditionalist
Technology 50%50% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

58.7pt

Structure

96.2% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.

Where should public power live?

41.2pt

Power

13.8% Security, compared with the ideology catalog’s 55% median.

How far should the state reach into everyday life?

28.7pt

Intervention

81.2% Non-interventionist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 52.5% median.

How assertively should a state project its interests abroad?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 96.2% Federal, 3.8% Unitary (Very strong Federal); Representation: 82.5% Democracy, 17.5% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Proudhonian Mutualism sits 25.0 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 13.8% Security, 86.2% Liberty (Strong Liberty); Immigration: 68.8% Assimilation, 31.2% Multiculturalism (Leaning Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Proudhonian Mutualism sits 45.0 points below it. 87 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 17.5% Militarist, 82.5% Pacifist (Strong Pacifist); Intervention: 81.2% Non-interventionist, 18.8% Nationalist (Strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Proudhonian Mutualism sits 32.4 points above it. 105 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 72.5% Public, 27.5% Private (Strong Public); Control: 40% Planning, 60% Free market (Leaning Free market); Trade: 70% Protectionism, 30% Globalism (Leaning Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Proudhonian Mutualism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Proudhonian Mutualism sits 19.3 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 80% Irreligious, 20% Religious (Strong Irreligious); Morality: 17.5% Progressive, 82.5% Traditionalist (Strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Proudhonian Mutualism sits 21.3 points below it. 182 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 50% Technology, 50% Biology (Balanced). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Proudhonian Mutualism, the 0.0-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Proudhonian Mutualism sits 7.5 points below it. 225 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Proudhonian Mutualism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Proudhonian Mutualism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Proudhonian Mutualism.

Which ideology is closest to Proudhonian Mutualism?

Agrarianism has 87.6% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Proudhonian Mutualism?

Structure is among the furthest from the center: 96.2% Federal and 3.8% Unitary. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test