Left

Christian Social Democracy

Current that turns the Gospel into reforms within democracy, defending a welfare state, labor rights, unions and redistribution without breaking with the market or with liberal institutions.

I want social justice guided by the Gospel, won at the ballot box, with strong unions, a welfare state and dignity for working people.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 42.5%57.5% Unitary
Democracy 82.5%17.5% Autocracy
Security 50%50% Liberty
Assimilation 22.5%77.5% Multiculturalism
Militarist 11.2%88.8% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 78.8%21.2% Nationalist
Public 95%5% Private
Planning 83.8%16.2% Free market
Protectionism 71.2%28.8% Globalism
Irreligious 28.7%71.3% Religious
Progressive 43.8%56.2% Traditionalist
Technology 31.2%68.8% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

37.5pt

Economy

95% Public, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.5% median.

Who should own productive assets and provide essential services?

34.0pt

Diplomacy

11.2% Militarist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 45.25% median.

When is armed force an appropriate political instrument?

29.5pt

Religion

28.7% Irreligious, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.2% median.

What place should religion have in individual and public life?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 42.5% Federal, 57.5% Unitary (Leaning Unitary); Representation: 82.5% Democracy, 17.5% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Christian Social Democracy sits 25.0 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 50% Security, 50% Liberty (Balanced); Immigration: 22.5% Assimilation, 77.5% Multiculturalism (Strong Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Christian Social Democracy sits 8.8 points below it. 128 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 11.2% Militarist, 88.8% Pacifist (Very strong Pacifist); Intervention: 78.8% Non-interventionist, 21.2% Nationalist (Strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Christian Social Democracy sits 30.0 points above it. 105 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 95% Public, 5% Private (Very strong Public); Control: 83.8% Planning, 16.2% Free market (Strong Planning); Trade: 71.2% Protectionism, 28.8% Globalism (Leaning Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Christian Social Democracy depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Christian Social Democracy sits 41.8 points above it. 83 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 28.7% Irreligious, 71.3% Religious (Leaning Religious); Morality: 43.8% Progressive, 56.2% Traditionalist (Balanced). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Christian Social Democracy sits 5.0 points above it. 107 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 31.2% Technology, 68.8% Biology (Leaning Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Christian Social Democracy, the 18.8-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Christian Social Democracy sits 26.3 points below it. 117 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

At the other end of the catalog

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Christian Social Democracy on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Christian Social Democracy on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Christian Social Democracy.

Which ideology is closest to Christian Social Democracy?

Christian Labourism has 97.5% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Christian Social Democracy?

Economy is among the furthest from the center: 95% Public and 5% Private. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test