Center
Political Buddhism
Applies the Dharma to politics: Ashoka's righteous king, Schumacher's Buddhist economics, Buddhadasa's Dhammic socialism and Bhutan's Gross National Happiness. It prioritizes nonviolence, moderate consumption, community and harmony with nature.
I want a society guided by the Dharma and nonviolence, with righteous rulers, moderate consumption and a community economy in harmony with nature.Compare your own views
01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
40.3pt
Diplomacy
5% Militarist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 45.25% median.
When is armed force an appropriate political instrument?
32.5pt
Structure
70% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.
Where should public power live?
31.7pt
Technology
26.2% Technology, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.9% median.
How readily should technology reshape human life?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 70% Federal, 30% Unitary (Leaning Federal); Representation: 72.5% Democracy, 27.5% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Political Buddhism sits 15.0 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 43.8% Security, 56.2% Liberty (Balanced); Immigration: 26.2% Assimilation, 73.8% Multiculturalism (Strong Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Political Buddhism sits 15.0 points below it. 128 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 5% Militarist, 95% Pacifist (Very strong Pacifist); Intervention: 72.5% Non-interventionist, 27.5% Nationalist (Strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Political Buddhism sits 23.7 points above it. 105 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 72.5% Public, 27.5% Private (Strong Public); Control: 63.7% Planning, 36.3% Free market (Leaning Planning); Trade: 72.5% Protectionism, 27.5% Globalism (Strong Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Political Buddhism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Political Buddhism sits 19.3 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 30% Irreligious, 70% Religious (Leaning Religious); Morality: 50% Progressive, 50% Traditionalist (Balanced). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Political Buddhism sits 11.2 points above it. 107 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 26.2% Technology, 73.8% Biology (Strong Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Political Buddhism, the 23.8-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Political Buddhism sits 31.3 points below it. 60 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles
Communitarianism
94.8% compatibility
Christian Labourism
94.1% compatibility
Christian Social Democracy
93.8% compatibility
Christian Progressivism
93.2% compatibility
Distributism
92.3% compatibility
Environmentalism
91.9% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest countries & regions
Closest political figures
Associated references
Got Political Buddhism on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Political Buddhism on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Political Buddhism.
Which ideology is closest to Political Buddhism?
Communitarianism has 94.8% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Political Buddhism?
Diplomacy is among the furthest from the center: 5% Militarist and 95% Pacifist. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.






