Anarchist

Green Anarchism

Current that unites anarchism and radical ecology, defending decentralized, sustainable communities without a state or exploitation of nature, in harmony with ecological cycles and non-human life.

I want decentralized communities without a state, living in harmony with ecological cycles, without exploiting nature.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 96.2%3.8% Unitary
Democracy 88.8%11.2% Autocracy
Security 10%90% Liberty
Assimilation 10%90% Multiculturalism
Militarist 2.5%97.5% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 95%5% Nationalist
Public 83.8%16.2% Private
Planning 66.2%33.8% Free market
Protectionism 70%30% Globalism
Irreligious 88.8%11.2% Religious
Progressive 88.8%11.2% Traditionalist
Technology 8.8%91.2% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

58.7pt

Structure

96.2% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.

Where should public power live?

49.1pt

Technology

8.8% Technology, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.9% median.

How readily should technology reshape human life?

46.3pt

Morality

88.8% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.

Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 96.2% Federal, 3.8% Unitary (Very strong Federal); Representation: 88.8% Democracy, 11.2% Autocracy (Very strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Green Anarchism sits 31.3 points above it. 44 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 10% Security, 90% Liberty (Very strong Liberty); Immigration: 10% Assimilation, 90% Multiculturalism (Very strong Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Green Anarchism sits 48.8 points below it. 62 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 2.5% Militarist, 97.5% Pacifist (Very strong Pacifist); Intervention: 95% Non-interventionist, 5% Nationalist (Very strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Green Anarchism sits 46.2 points above it. 28 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 83.8% Public, 16.2% Private (Strong Public); Control: 66.2% Planning, 33.8% Free market (Leaning Planning); Trade: 70% Protectionism, 30% Globalism (Leaning Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Green Anarchism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Green Anarchism sits 30.6 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 88.8% Irreligious, 11.2% Religious (Very strong Irreligious); Morality: 88.8% Progressive, 11.2% Traditionalist (Very strong Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Green Anarchism sits 50.0 points above it. 21 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 8.8% Technology, 91.2% Biology (Very strong Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Green Anarchism, the 41.2-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Green Anarchism sits 48.7 points below it. 25 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Green Anarchism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Green Anarchism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Green Anarchism.

Which ideology is closest to Green Anarchism?

Anarcho-Naturism has 97.7% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Green Anarchism?

Diplomacy is among the furthest from the center: 2.5% Militarist and 97.5% Pacifist. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test