Peasant-militia anarchism

Free Territory (Makhnovshchina)

During the Russian Revolution, Makhno's Free Territory was an anarchist experiment in Ukraine, with self-managed peasant communes and popular militias that rejected both the White state and Bolshevik power.

Flag: Free Territory (Makhnovshchina)

Historical polity · 1918–1921

This profile represents the catalog’s interpretation of a political system, rather than the opinions of all its residents.

Wikimedia Commons · Estandarte do Exército Insurgente Revolucionário da Ucrânia (Makhnovistas) usado como referência visual.

Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 97.5%2.5% Unitary
Democracy 86.2%13.8% Autocracy
Security 8.8%91.2% Liberty
Assimilation 10%90% Multiculturalism
Militarist 18.8%81.2% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 86.2%13.8% Nationalist
Public 78.8%21.2% Private
Planning 55%45% Free market
Protectionism 67.5%32.5% Globalism
Irreligious 88.8%11.2% Religious
Progressive 62.5%37.5% Traditionalist
Technology 42.5%57.5% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

60.0pt

Structure

97.5% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.

Where should public power live?

46.2pt

Power

8.8% Security, compared with the ideology catalog’s 55% median.

How far should the state reach into everyday life?

39.8pt

Immigration

10% Assimilation, compared with the ideology catalog’s 49.75% median.

How should a society approach migration and cultural difference?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 97.5% Federal, 2.5% Unitary (Very strong Federal); Representation: 86.2% Democracy, 13.8% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Free Territory (Makhnovshchina) sits 28.7 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 8.8% Security, 91.2% Liberty (Very strong Liberty); Immigration: 10% Assimilation, 90% Multiculturalism (Very strong Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Free Territory (Makhnovshchina) sits 50.0 points below it. 62 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 18.8% Militarist, 81.2% Pacifist (Strong Pacifist); Intervention: 86.2% Non-interventionist, 13.8% Nationalist (Strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Free Territory (Makhnovshchina) sits 37.4 points above it. 105 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 78.8% Public, 21.2% Private (Strong Public); Control: 55% Planning, 45% Free market (Balanced); Trade: 67.5% Protectionism, 32.5% Globalism (Leaning Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Free Territory (Makhnovshchina) depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Free Territory (Makhnovshchina) sits 25.6 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 88.8% Irreligious, 11.2% Religious (Very strong Irreligious); Morality: 62.5% Progressive, 37.5% Traditionalist (Leaning Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Free Territory (Makhnovshchina) sits 23.7 points above it. 151 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 42.5% Technology, 57.5% Biology (Leaning Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Free Territory (Makhnovshchina), the 7.5-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Free Territory (Makhnovshchina) sits 15.0 points below it. 117 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest ideologies

Closest political figures

Got Free Territory (Makhnovshchina) on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Free Territory (Makhnovshchina) on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Free Territory (Makhnovshchina).

Which ideology is closest to Free Territory (Makhnovshchina)?

Kropotkinian Anarchism has 99% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Free Territory (Makhnovshchina)?

Structure is among the furthest from the center: 97.5% Federal and 2.5% Unitary. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test