Right
Islamism
Political movement advocating a state governed by sharia and Islamic identity, born with Hassan al-Banna's and Sayyid Qutb's Muslim Brotherhood, combining mass activism, religious social welfare and rejection of Western secularism.
I want an Islamic society guided by sharia, with believers organized from the mosques and a zakat economy free of usury.Compare your own views
01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
56.1pt
Religion
2.1% Irreligious, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.2% median.
What place should religion have in individual and public life?
32.4pt
Morality
10.1% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.
Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?
27.2pt
Diplomacy
72.4% Militarist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 45.25% median.
When is armed force an appropriate political instrument?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 24.8% Federal, 75.2% Unitary (Strong Unitary); Representation: 63.2% Democracy, 36.8% Autocracy (Leaning Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Islamism sits 5.7 points above it. 124 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 66.3% Security, 33.7% Liberty (Leaning Security); Immigration: 59.9% Assimilation, 40.1% Multiculturalism (Leaning Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Islamism sits 7.5 points above it. 175 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 72.4% Militarist, 27.6% Pacifist (Leaning Militarist); Intervention: 46.7% Non-interventionist, 53.3% Nationalist (Balanced). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Islamism sits 2.1 points below it. 167 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 59.1% Public, 40.9% Private (Leaning Public); Control: 61.6% Planning, 38.4% Free market (Leaning Planning); Trade: 56.8% Protectionism, 43.2% Globalism (Balanced). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Islamism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Islamism sits 5.9 points above it. 166 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 2.1% Irreligious, 97.9% Religious (Very strong Religious); Morality: 10.1% Progressive, 89.9% Traditionalist (Very strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Islamism sits 28.7 points below it. 116 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 50% Technology, 50% Biology (Balanced). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Islamism, the 0.0-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Islamism sits 7.5 points below it. 225 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles
National Conservatism
96% compatibility
Christian Conservatism
94.6% compatibility
Paternalistic Conservatism
93.9% compatibility
Buddhist Nationalism
93.9% compatibility
Peronist Nationalism
93.9% compatibility
Right-Wing Populism
93.6% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest countries & regions
Closest political figures
Associated references
Got Islamism on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Islamism on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Islamism.
Which ideology is closest to Islamism?
National Conservatism has 96% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Islamism?
Religion is among the furthest from the center: 2.1% Irreligious and 97.9% Religious. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.







