Libertarian

Paleolibertarianism

Branch that combines radical free markets with traditional, conservative cultural values, defending economic freedom, property, and autonomous local communities against the state and progressivism.

I want radical free markets united with traditional values, with property and autonomous local communities against the state.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 98.8%1.2% Unitary
Democracy 77.5%22.5% Autocracy
Security 5%95% Liberty
Assimilation 71.2%28.8% Multiculturalism
Militarist 15%85% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 73.8%26.2% Nationalist
Public 6.2%93.8% Private
Planning 1.2%98.8% Free market
Protectionism 11.2%88.8% Globalism
Irreligious 28.7%71.3% Religious
Progressive 8.8%91.2% Traditionalist
Technology 56.2%43.8% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

61.3pt

Structure

98.8% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.

Where should public power live?

61.3pt

Control

1.2% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.

How should economic activity be coordinated?

51.3pt

Economy

6.2% Public, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.5% median.

Who should own productive assets and provide essential services?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 98.8% Federal, 1.2% Unitary (Very strong Federal); Representation: 77.5% Democracy, 22.5% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Paleolibertarianism sits 20.0 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 5% Security, 95% Liberty (Very strong Liberty); Immigration: 71.2% Assimilation, 28.8% Multiculturalism (Leaning Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Paleolibertarianism sits 53.8 points below it. 62 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 15% Militarist, 85% Pacifist (Strong Pacifist); Intervention: 73.8% Non-interventionist, 26.2% Nationalist (Strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Paleolibertarianism sits 25.0 points above it. 105 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 6.2% Public, 93.8% Private (Very strong Private); Control: 1.2% Planning, 98.8% Free market (Very strong Free market); Trade: 11.2% Protectionism, 88.8% Globalism (Very strong Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Paleolibertarianism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Paleolibertarianism sits 47.0 points below it. 36 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 28.7% Irreligious, 71.3% Religious (Leaning Religious); Morality: 8.8% Progressive, 91.2% Traditionalist (Very strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Paleolibertarianism sits 30.0 points below it. 116 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 56.2% Technology, 43.8% Biology (Balanced). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Paleolibertarianism, the 6.2-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Paleolibertarianism sits 1.3 points below it. 225 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Paleolibertarianism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Paleolibertarianism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Paleolibertarianism.

Which ideology is closest to Paleolibertarianism?

Anarcho-Conservatism has 96.3% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Paleolibertarianism?

Structure is among the furthest from the center: 98.8% Federal and 1.2% Unitary. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test