Libertarian

Hoppean Libertarianism

Current linked to Hans-Hermann Hoppe that unites anarcho-capitalism, absolute private property, and criticism of democracy, defending social orders based on contract, voluntary exclusion, and private authority.

I want an order of absolute private property, governed by contracts and communities that expel those who reject their rules, without egalitarian democracy or a state.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 95%5% Unitary
Democracy 41.2%58.8% Autocracy
Security 7.5%92.5% Liberty
Assimilation 76.2%23.8% Multiculturalism
Militarist 25%75% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 87.5%12.5% Nationalist
Public 1.2%98.8% Private
Planning 2.5%97.5% Free market
Protectionism 7.5%92.5% Globalism
Irreligious 58.8%41.2% Religious
Progressive 22.5%77.5% Traditionalist
Technology 81.2%18.8% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

60.0pt

Control

2.5% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.

How should economic activity be coordinated?

57.5pt

Structure

95% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.

Where should public power live?

56.3pt

Economy

1.2% Public, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.5% median.

Who should own productive assets and provide essential services?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 95% Federal, 5% Unitary (Very strong Federal); Representation: 41.2% Democracy, 58.8% Autocracy (Leaning Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Hoppean Libertarianism sits 16.3 points below it. 99 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 7.5% Security, 92.5% Liberty (Very strong Liberty); Immigration: 76.2% Assimilation, 23.8% Multiculturalism (Strong Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Hoppean Libertarianism sits 51.3 points below it. 62 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 25% Militarist, 75% Pacifist (Strong Pacifist); Intervention: 87.5% Non-interventionist, 12.5% Nationalist (Very strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Hoppean Libertarianism sits 38.7 points above it. 28 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 1.2% Public, 98.8% Private (Very strong Private); Control: 2.5% Planning, 97.5% Free market (Very strong Free market); Trade: 7.5% Protectionism, 92.5% Globalism (Very strong Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Hoppean Libertarianism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Hoppean Libertarianism sits 52.0 points below it. 36 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 58.8% Irreligious, 41.2% Religious (Leaning Irreligious); Morality: 22.5% Progressive, 77.5% Traditionalist (Strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Hoppean Libertarianism sits 16.3 points below it. 182 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 81.2% Technology, 18.8% Biology (Strong Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Hoppean Libertarianism, the 31.2-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Hoppean Libertarianism sits 23.7 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Hoppean Libertarianism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Hoppean Libertarianism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Hoppean Libertarianism.

Which ideology is closest to Hoppean Libertarianism?

Libertarian Monarchism has 92.8% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Hoppean Libertarianism?

Economy is among the furthest from the center: 1.2% Public and 98.8% Private. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test