Far-Right
Pan-Islamism
Ideology advocating the political unity of Muslims above national borders, around the ummah and the ideal of a caliphate, formulated by Jamal al-Din al-Afghani and adopted by Ottoman sultan Abdul Hamid II against European colonialism.
I want the ummah united across borders under a caliphate, with Islamic law everywhere and the Muslim world free of Western domination.Compare your own views
01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
56.1pt
Religion
2.1% Irreligious, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.2% median.
What place should religion have in individual and public life?
32.4pt
Morality
10.1% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.
Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?
30.7pt
Representation
28.1% Democracy, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.8% median.
Who should govern, and how should they be accountable?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 30.6% Federal, 69.4% Unitary (Leaning Unitary); Representation: 28.1% Democracy, 71.9% Autocracy (Leaning Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Pan-Islamism sits 29.4 points below it. 99 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 79% Security, 21% Liberty (Strong Security); Immigration: 53.9% Assimilation, 46.1% Multiculturalism (Balanced). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Pan-Islamism sits 20.2 points above it. 179 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 73.1% Militarist, 26.9% Pacifist (Strong Militarist); Intervention: 25.7% Non-interventionist, 74.3% Nationalist (Strong Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Pan-Islamism sits 23.1 points below it. 144 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 55.4% Public, 44.6% Private (Balanced); Control: 64.8% Planning, 35.2% Free market (Leaning Planning); Trade: 74% Protectionism, 26% Globalism (Strong Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Pan-Islamism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Pan-Islamism sits 2.2 points above it. 207 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 2.1% Irreligious, 97.9% Religious (Very strong Religious); Morality: 10.1% Progressive, 89.9% Traditionalist (Very strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Pan-Islamism sits 28.7 points below it. 116 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 60.6% Technology, 39.4% Biology (Leaning Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Pan-Islamism, the 10.6-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Pan-Islamism sits 3.1 points above it. 299 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles
Corporatism
96.1% compatibility
Right-Wing Populism
95.3% compatibility
Brazilian Integralism
94.4% compatibility
Bonapartism
94.3% compatibility
National Capitalism
94.3% compatibility
Islamic Theocratism
94.3% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest countries & regions
Closest political figures
Associated references
Got Pan-Islamism on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Pan-Islamism on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Pan-Islamism.
Which ideology is closest to Pan-Islamism?
Corporatism has 96.1% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Pan-Islamism?
Religion is among the furthest from the center: 2.1% Irreligious and 97.9% Religious. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.







