Center

Securitarian Democracy

Militant democracy doctrine, authorizing a democratic state to restrict the enemies of democracy itself by banning anti-system parties, monitoring extremists and maintaining conscription and reinforced security to defend the constitutional order.

I want a militant democracy that watches extremists, bans anti-system parties and keeps military service to shield the constitutional order.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 30%70% Unitary
Democracy 78.8%21.2% Autocracy
Security 75%25% Liberty
Assimilation 55%45% Multiculturalism
Militarist 57.5%42.5% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 42.5%57.5% Nationalist
Public 45%55% Private
Planning 46.2%53.8% Free market
Protectionism 53.8%46.2% Globalism
Irreligious 61.3%38.7% Religious
Progressive 60%40% Traditionalist
Technology 63.7%36.3% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

20.0pt

Representation

78.8% Democracy, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.8% median.

Who should govern, and how should they be accountable?

20.0pt

Power

75% Security, compared with the ideology catalog’s 55% median.

How far should the state reach into everyday life?

17.5pt

Morality

60% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.

Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 30% Federal, 70% Unitary (Leaning Unitary); Representation: 78.8% Democracy, 21.2% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Securitarian Democracy sits 21.3 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 75% Security, 25% Liberty (Strong Security); Immigration: 55% Assimilation, 45% Multiculturalism (Balanced). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Securitarian Democracy sits 16.2 points above it. 179 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 57.5% Militarist, 42.5% Pacifist (Leaning Militarist); Intervention: 42.5% Non-interventionist, 57.5% Nationalist (Leaning Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Securitarian Democracy sits 6.3 points below it. 187 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 45% Public, 55% Private (Balanced); Control: 46.2% Planning, 53.8% Free market (Balanced); Trade: 53.8% Protectionism, 46.2% Globalism (Balanced). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Securitarian Democracy depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Securitarian Democracy sits 8.2 points below it. 207 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 61.3% Irreligious, 38.7% Religious (Leaning Irreligious); Morality: 60% Progressive, 40% Traditionalist (Leaning Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Securitarian Democracy sits 21.2 points above it. 151 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 63.7% Technology, 36.3% Biology (Leaning Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Securitarian Democracy, the 13.7-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Securitarian Democracy sits 6.2 points above it. 299 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Securitarian Democracy on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Securitarian Democracy on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Securitarian Democracy.

Which ideology is closest to Securitarian Democracy?

Third Way has 93.7% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Securitarian Democracy?

Representation is among the furthest from the center: 78.8% Democracy and 21.2% Autocracy. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test