Rentier frontier region
Alaska (United States)
The largest US state and one of the least densely populated, Alaska lives off oil, pays every resident an annual dividend from its Permanent Fund, levies no state income tax, and has a strong gun culture, Native corporations and distrust of the federal government.

Region or entity
This profile represents the catalog’s interpretation of a political system, rather than the opinions of all its residents.
Wikimedia Commons · Bandeira do estado do Alasca (Estados Unidos) usada como referência visual da região.
Compare your own views01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
42.0pt
Structure
79.5% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.
Where should public power live?
28.0pt
Power
27% Security, compared with the ideology catalog’s 55% median.
How far should the state reach into everyday life?
27.6pt
Trade
34.1% Protectionism, compared with the ideology catalog’s 61.7% median.
How open should the economy be to international exchange?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 79.5% Federal, 20.5% Unitary (Strong Federal); Representation: 85.9% Democracy, 14.1% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Alaska (United States) sits 28.4 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 27% Security, 73% Liberty (Strong Liberty); Immigration: 42.4% Assimilation, 57.6% Multiculturalism (Leaning Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Alaska (United States) sits 31.8 points below it. 87 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 64.8% Militarist, 35.2% Pacifist (Leaning Militarist); Intervention: 30.5% Non-interventionist, 69.5% Nationalist (Leaning Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Alaska (United States) sits 18.3 points below it. 187 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 46% Public, 54% Private (Balanced); Control: 35.4% Planning, 64.6% Free market (Leaning Free market); Trade: 34.1% Protectionism, 65.9% Globalism (Leaning Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Alaska (United States) depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Alaska (United States) sits 7.2 points below it. 207 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 57.6% Irreligious, 42.4% Religious (Leaning Irreligious); Morality: 41.9% Progressive, 58.1% Traditionalist (Leaning Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Alaska (United States) sits 3.1 points above it. 197 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 58.2% Technology, 41.8% Biology (Leaning Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Alaska (United States), the 8.2-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Alaska (United States) sits 0.7 points above it. 299 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles

United States
94.7% compatibility

Washington, D.C. (United States)
93.2% compatibility

Pennsylvania (United States)
91.5% compatibility

Madrid (Spain)
90% compatibility

United Kingdom
89.9% compatibility

Utah (United States)
89.2% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest ideologies
Closest political figures
Explore the same region

United States
94.7% compatibility

Washington, D.C. (United States)
93.2% compatibility

Pennsylvania (United States)
91.5% compatibility

Utah (United States)
89.2% compatibility

Illinois (United States)
88.5% compatibility

Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil)
88% compatibility
Got Alaska (United States) on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Alaska (United States) on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Alaska (United States).
Which ideology is closest to Alaska (United States)?
Libertarian Militarism has 90.2% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Alaska (United States)?
Representation is among the furthest from the center: 85.9% Democracy and 14.1% Autocracy. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.



