Ranching-agribusiness region
Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil)
Brazil's southernmost state, Rio Grande do Sul has a strong regional identity and a tradition of polarized political disputes, with an economy built on agribusiness, ranching, and industry.

Region or entity
This profile represents the catalog’s interpretation of a political system, rather than the opinions of all its residents.
Wikimedia Commons · Bandeira do estado do Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil) usada como referência visual da região.
Compare your own views01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
30.0pt
Structure
67.5% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.
Where should public power live?
27.9pt
Trade
33.8% Protectionism, compared with the ideology catalog’s 61.7% median.
How open should the economy be to international exchange?
20.0pt
Morality
62.5% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.
Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 67.5% Federal, 32.5% Unitary (Leaning Federal); Representation: 77.5% Democracy, 22.5% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) sits 20.0 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 40% Security, 60% Liberty (Leaning Liberty); Immigration: 37.5% Assimilation, 62.5% Multiculturalism (Leaning Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) sits 18.8 points below it. 151 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 32.5% Militarist, 67.5% Pacifist (Leaning Pacifist); Intervention: 58.8% Non-interventionist, 41.2% Nationalist (Leaning Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) sits 10.0 points above it. 203 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 51.2% Public, 48.8% Private (Balanced); Control: 43.8% Planning, 56.2% Free market (Balanced); Trade: 33.8% Protectionism, 66.2% Globalism (Leaning Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) sits 2.0 points below it. 207 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 52.5% Irreligious, 47.5% Religious (Balanced); Morality: 62.5% Progressive, 37.5% Traditionalist (Leaning Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) sits 23.7 points above it. 151 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 63.7% Technology, 36.3% Biology (Leaning Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil), the 13.7-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) sits 6.2 points above it. 299 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles

Puerto Rico (United States)
96.6% compatibility

Germany
96.5% compatibility

European Union
96.4% compatibility

Spain
96.3% compatibility

Canada
95.9% compatibility

Belgium
95% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest ideologies
Closest political figures
Explore the same region

Puerto Rico (United States)
96.6% compatibility

Canada
95.9% compatibility

São Paulo (Brazil)
94.6% compatibility

New York (United States)
94.1% compatibility

Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)
94% compatibility

Massachusetts (United States)
93.8% compatibility
Got Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil).
Which ideology is closest to Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil)?
Islamic Liberalism has 97.1% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil)?
Representation is among the furthest from the center: 77.5% Democracy and 22.5% Autocracy. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.



