Presidential republic
Ecuador
An Andean republic dollarized since 2000, Ecuador is governed by Daniel Noboa, who declared an internal armed conflict against organized crime and deployed soldiers in the streets and prisons, but saw foreign military bases rejected in a 2025 referendum.

Current country
This profile represents the catalog’s interpretation of a political system, rather than the opinions of all its residents.
Compare your own views01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
33.5pt
Trade
28.2% Protectionism, compared with the ideology catalog’s 61.7% median.
How open should the economy be to international exchange?
25.8pt
Technology
32.1% Technology, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.9% median.
How readily should technology reshape human life?
21.1pt
Control
41.4% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.
How should economic activity be coordinated?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 23.6% Federal, 76.4% Unitary (Strong Unitary); Representation: 71.6% Democracy, 28.4% Autocracy (Leaning Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Ecuador sits 14.1 points above it. 124 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 67.5% Security, 32.5% Liberty (Leaning Security); Immigration: 32.6% Assimilation, 67.4% Multiculturalism (Leaning Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Ecuador sits 8.7 points above it. 175 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 38.3% Militarist, 61.7% Pacifist (Leaning Pacifist); Intervention: 60.1% Non-interventionist, 39.9% Nationalist (Leaning Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Ecuador sits 11.3 points above it. 203 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 53.2% Public, 46.8% Private (Balanced); Control: 41.4% Planning, 58.6% Free market (Leaning Free market); Trade: 28.2% Protectionism, 71.8% Globalism (Leaning Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Ecuador depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Ecuador sits 0.0 points above it. 207 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 53.2% Irreligious, 46.8% Religious (Balanced); Morality: 42% Progressive, 58% Traditionalist (Leaning Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Ecuador sits 3.2 points above it. 197 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 32.1% Technology, 67.9% Biology (Leaning Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Ecuador, the 17.9-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Ecuador sits 25.4 points below it. 117 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles

Peru
92.2% compatibility

Mexico
91.8% compatibility

Mongolia
91.7% compatibility

Costa Rica
91.4% compatibility

Panama
91.3% compatibility

Colombia
90.9% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest ideologies
Closest political figures
Explore the same region

Peru
92.2% compatibility

Mexico
91.8% compatibility

Costa Rica
91.4% compatibility

Panama
91.3% compatibility

Colombia
90.9% compatibility

Paraguay
90.3% compatibility
Got Ecuador on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Ecuador on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Ecuador.
Which ideology is closest to Ecuador?
Brazilian Social Democracy has 89.5% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Ecuador?
Structure is among the furthest from the center: 23.6% Federal and 76.4% Unitary. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.


