Anarchist

Kropotkinian Anarchism

Current of Peter Kropotkin that sees mutual aid as a law of nature and proposes federated communes, integration of farming and industry, science serving all and an ethics of solidarity without the state.

I want free communes federated by mutual aid, joining field and factory, with everything shared by need and no state at all.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 91.2%8.8% Unitary
Democracy 88.8%11.2% Autocracy
Security 12.5%87.5% Liberty
Assimilation 17.5%82.5% Multiculturalism
Militarist 21.2%78.8% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 80%20% Nationalist
Public 85%15% Private
Planning 65%35% Free market
Protectionism 67.5%32.5% Globalism
Irreligious 91.2%8.8% Religious
Progressive 70%30% Traditionalist
Technology 51.2%48.8% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

53.7pt

Structure

91.2% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.

Where should public power live?

42.5pt

Power

12.5% Security, compared with the ideology catalog’s 55% median.

How far should the state reach into everyday life?

33.0pt

Religion

91.2% Irreligious, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.2% median.

What place should religion have in individual and public life?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 91.2% Federal, 8.8% Unitary (Very strong Federal); Representation: 88.8% Democracy, 11.2% Autocracy (Very strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Kropotkinian Anarchism sits 31.3 points above it. 44 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 12.5% Security, 87.5% Liberty (Very strong Liberty); Immigration: 17.5% Assimilation, 82.5% Multiculturalism (Strong Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Kropotkinian Anarchism sits 46.3 points below it. 62 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 21.2% Militarist, 78.8% Pacifist (Strong Pacifist); Intervention: 80% Non-interventionist, 20% Nationalist (Strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Kropotkinian Anarchism sits 31.2 points above it. 105 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 85% Public, 15% Private (Strong Public); Control: 65% Planning, 35% Free market (Leaning Planning); Trade: 67.5% Protectionism, 32.5% Globalism (Leaning Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Kropotkinian Anarchism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Kropotkinian Anarchism sits 31.8 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 91.2% Irreligious, 8.8% Religious (Very strong Irreligious); Morality: 70% Progressive, 30% Traditionalist (Leaning Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Kropotkinian Anarchism sits 31.2 points above it. 151 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 51.2% Technology, 48.8% Biology (Balanced). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Kropotkinian Anarchism, the 1.2-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Kropotkinian Anarchism sits 6.3 points below it. 225 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Kropotkinian Anarchism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Kropotkinian Anarchism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Kropotkinian Anarchism.

Which ideology is closest to Kropotkinian Anarchism?

Luxemburgist Socialism has 95.6% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Kropotkinian Anarchism?

Structure is among the furthest from the center: 91.2% Federal and 8.8% Unitary. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test