Historic-moderate region
Minas Gerais (Brazil)
A historic mining state and birthplace of a failed 18th-century independence conspiracy against colonial rule, Minas Gerais has an economy built on mining and agriculture, with traditionally moderate, conciliatory politics.

Region or entity
This profile represents the catalog’s interpretation of a political system, rather than the opinions of all its residents.
Wikimedia Commons · Bandeira do estado de Minas Gerais (Brasil) usada como referência visual da região.
Compare your own views01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
17.5pt
Control
45% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.
How should economic activity be coordinated?
15.0pt
Representation
73.8% Democracy, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.8% median.
Who should govern, and how should they be accountable?
12.5pt
Structure
50% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.
Where should public power live?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 50% Federal, 50% Unitary (Balanced); Representation: 73.8% Democracy, 26.2% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Minas Gerais (Brazil) sits 16.3 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 50% Security, 50% Liberty (Balanced); Immigration: 40% Assimilation, 60% Multiculturalism (Leaning Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Minas Gerais (Brazil) sits 8.8 points below it. 128 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 35% Militarist, 65% Pacifist (Leaning Pacifist); Intervention: 57.5% Non-interventionist, 42.5% Nationalist (Leaning Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Minas Gerais (Brazil) sits 8.7 points above it. 203 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 51.2% Public, 48.8% Private (Balanced); Control: 45% Planning, 55% Free market (Balanced); Trade: 51.2% Protectionism, 48.8% Globalism (Balanced). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Minas Gerais (Brazil) depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Minas Gerais (Brazil) sits 2.0 points below it. 207 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 47.5% Irreligious, 52.5% Religious (Balanced); Morality: 38.8% Progressive, 61.2% Traditionalist (Leaning Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Minas Gerais (Brazil) sits 0.0 points above it. 197 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 61.3% Technology, 38.7% Biology (Leaning Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Minas Gerais (Brazil), the 11.3-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Minas Gerais (Brazil) sits 3.8 points above it. 299 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles

South Africa
95.7% compatibility

Brazil
95.6% compatibility

Mexico
94.2% compatibility

Germany
92.7% compatibility

Puerto Rico (United States)
92% compatibility

Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil)
92% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest ideologies
Closest political figures
Explore the same region

Brazil
95.6% compatibility

Mexico
94.2% compatibility

Puerto Rico (United States)
92% compatibility

Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil)
92% compatibility

Colombia
90.7% compatibility

Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)
90.4% compatibility
Got Minas Gerais (Brazil) on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Minas Gerais (Brazil) on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Minas Gerais (Brazil).
Which ideology is closest to Minas Gerais (Brazil)?
Centrism has 96.3% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Minas Gerais (Brazil)?
Representation is among the furthest from the center: 73.8% Democracy and 26.2% Autocracy. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.



