Center

Meritocracy

Principle according to which positions and rewards should be distributed by talent, effort, and performance rather than origin or privilege, defending equal opportunity and selection by ability.

I want a society where talent and effort decide positions, with equal opportunity and rewards proportional to each person's merit.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 43.8%56.2% Unitary
Democracy 75%25% Autocracy
Security 32.5%67.5% Liberty
Assimilation 30%70% Multiculturalism
Militarist 33.8%66.2% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 56.2%43.8% Nationalist
Public 50%50% Private
Planning 37.5%62.5% Free market
Protectionism 27.5%72.5% Globalism
Irreligious 55%45% Religious
Progressive 68.8%31.2% Traditionalist
Technology 68.8%31.2% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

34.2pt

Trade

27.5% Protectionism, compared with the ideology catalog’s 61.7% median.

How open should the economy be to international exchange?

26.3pt

Morality

68.8% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.

Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?

25.0pt

Control

37.5% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.

How should economic activity be coordinated?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 43.8% Federal, 56.2% Unitary (Balanced); Representation: 75% Democracy, 25% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Meritocracy sits 17.5 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 32.5% Security, 67.5% Liberty (Leaning Liberty); Immigration: 30% Assimilation, 70% Multiculturalism (Leaning Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Meritocracy sits 26.3 points below it. 151 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 33.8% Militarist, 66.2% Pacifist (Leaning Pacifist); Intervention: 56.2% Non-interventionist, 43.8% Nationalist (Balanced). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Meritocracy sits 7.4 points above it. 167 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 50% Public, 50% Private (Balanced); Control: 37.5% Planning, 62.5% Free market (Leaning Free market); Trade: 27.5% Protectionism, 72.5% Globalism (Strong Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Meritocracy depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Meritocracy sits 3.2 points below it. 207 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 55% Irreligious, 45% Religious (Balanced); Morality: 68.8% Progressive, 31.2% Traditionalist (Leaning Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Meritocracy sits 30.0 points above it. 151 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 68.8% Technology, 31.2% Biology (Leaning Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Meritocracy, the 18.8-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Meritocracy sits 11.3 points above it. 299 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Meritocracy on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Meritocracy on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Meritocracy.

Which ideology is closest to Meritocracy?

Islamic Liberalism has 97.5% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Meritocracy?

Representation is among the furthest from the center: 75% Democracy and 25% Autocracy. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test