Political leader
Cicero
A Roman statesman and philosopher, Cicero defended the republic, mixed government, and the rule of law, bequeathing the tradition of civic republicanism and natural law that influenced Western political thought.

Image: José Luiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons · cropped and resized
Statesman and philosopher · 106–43 a.C.
Profile is a model built from 240 answers simulated in character; not a statement by the person.
Compare your own views01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
32.5pt
Control
30% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.
How should economic activity be coordinated?
28.8pt
Economy
28.7% Public, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.5% median.
Who should own productive assets and provide essential services?
22.9pt
Technology
35% Technology, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.9% median.
How readily should technology reshape human life?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 33.8% Federal, 66.2% Unitary (Leaning Unitary); Representation: 58.8% Democracy, 41.2% Autocracy (Leaning Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Cicero sits 1.3 points above it. 124 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 58.8% Security, 41.2% Liberty (Leaning Security); Immigration: 70% Assimilation, 30% Multiculturalism (Leaning Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Cicero sits 0.0 points above it. 175 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 58.8% Militarist, 41.2% Pacifist (Leaning Militarist); Intervention: 30% Non-interventionist, 70% Nationalist (Leaning Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Cicero sits 18.8 points below it. 187 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 28.7% Public, 71.3% Private (Leaning Private); Control: 30% Planning, 70% Free market (Leaning Free market); Trade: 55% Protectionism, 45% Globalism (Balanced). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Cicero depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Cicero sits 24.5 points below it. 179 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 36.2% Irreligious, 63.8% Religious (Leaning Religious); Morality: 21.2% Progressive, 78.8% Traditionalist (Strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Cicero sits 17.6 points below it. 182 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 35% Technology, 65% Biology (Leaning Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Cicero, the 15.0-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Cicero sits 22.5 points below it. 117 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles

Roger Scruton
96.6% compatibility
Matteo Salvini
95% compatibility
Flávio Bolsonaro
94.7% compatibility

Jordan Peterson
94.2% compatibility

Olavo de Carvalho
93.5% compatibility

Edmund Burke
93.4% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest ideologies
Closest countries & regions
Three views of compatibility
Political
Conservatism
96.8%
12 axes considered
Social
Conservatism
96.8%
9 axes considered
Economic
Conservatism
98%
3 axes considered
Further reading
-51
On the Commonwealth
Find the book ↗Got Cicero on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Cicero on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Cicero.
Which ideology is closest to Cicero?
Conservatism has 96.8% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Cicero?
Morality is among the furthest from the center: 21.2% Progressive and 78.8% Traditionalist. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.



