Entrepreneur
George Soros
An investor and founder of the Open Society Foundations, Soros defends liberal democracy, human rights, civil society, multiculturalism, drug policy reform, secularism, and open institutions against authoritarianism and closed nationalism.

Image: Aris Oikonomou / European Commission · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons · cropped and resized
Investor and philanthropist · 1930–
Profile is a model built from 240 answers simulated in character; not a statement by the person.
Compare your own views01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
46.7pt
Trade
15% Protectionism, compared with the ideology catalog’s 61.7% median.
How open should the economy be to international exchange?
46.3pt
Morality
88.8% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.
Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?
38.5pt
Immigration
11.2% Assimilation, compared with the ideology catalog’s 49.75% median.
How should a society approach migration and cultural difference?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 61.3% Federal, 38.7% Unitary (Leaning Federal); Representation: 83.8% Democracy, 16.2% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; George Soros sits 26.3 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 25% Security, 75% Liberty (Strong Liberty); Immigration: 11.2% Assimilation, 88.8% Multiculturalism (Very strong Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; George Soros sits 33.8 points below it. 87 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 17.5% Militarist, 82.5% Pacifist (Strong Pacifist); Intervention: 71.2% Non-interventionist, 28.8% Nationalist (Leaning Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; George Soros sits 22.4 points above it. 203 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 50% Public, 50% Private (Balanced); Control: 53.8% Planning, 46.2% Free market (Balanced); Trade: 15% Protectionism, 85% Globalism (Strong Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of George Soros depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; George Soros sits 3.2 points below it. 207 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 87.5% Irreligious, 12.5% Religious (Very strong Irreligious); Morality: 88.8% Progressive, 11.2% Traditionalist (Very strong Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; George Soros sits 50.0 points above it. 21 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 53.8% Technology, 46.2% Biology (Balanced). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For George Soros, the 3.8-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; George Soros sits 3.7 points below it. 225 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles

Thomas Paine
96% compatibility

Phil Zimmermann
94.8% compatibility

Albert Camus
94.3% compatibility

Albert Einstein
93.6% compatibility

Vitalik Buterin
93.5% compatibility

Randolph Bourne
93.4% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest ideologies
Closest countries & regions
Three views of compatibility
Political
Green Liberalism
96.3%
12 axes considered
Social
Progressive Liberalism
97%
9 axes considered
Economic
Progressive Liberalism
98.4%
3 axes considered
Further reading
1987
The Alchemy of Finance
Find the book ↗Got George Soros on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting George Soros on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with George Soros.
Which ideology is closest to George Soros?
Green Liberalism has 96.3% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for George Soros?
Immigration is among the furthest from the center: 11.2% Assimilation and 88.8% Multiculturalism. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.



