Center
Green Liberalism
Current that unites individual freedom, markets, and democracy with the ecological agenda, defending sustainability, rights, and innovation to reconcile economic prosperity with effective environmental protection.
I want a society that unites market and democracy with the ecological cause, innovating to reconcile prosperity with environmental sustainability.Compare your own views
01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
42.9pt
Trade
18.8% Protectionism, compared with the ideology catalog’s 61.7% median.
How open should the economy be to international exchange?
35.0pt
Morality
77.5% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.
Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?
31.3pt
Structure
68.8% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.
Where should public power live?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 68.8% Federal, 31.2% Unitary (Leaning Federal); Representation: 81.2% Democracy, 18.8% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Green Liberalism sits 23.7 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 27.5% Security, 72.5% Liberty (Strong Liberty); Immigration: 28.7% Assimilation, 71.3% Multiculturalism (Leaning Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Green Liberalism sits 31.3 points below it. 87 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 22.5% Militarist, 77.5% Pacifist (Strong Pacifist); Intervention: 68.8% Non-interventionist, 31.2% Nationalist (Leaning Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Green Liberalism sits 20.0 points above it. 203 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 50% Public, 50% Private (Balanced); Control: 33.8% Planning, 66.2% Free market (Leaning Free market); Trade: 18.8% Protectionism, 81.2% Globalism (Strong Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Green Liberalism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Green Liberalism sits 3.2 points below it. 207 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 76.2% Irreligious, 23.8% Religious (Strong Irreligious); Morality: 77.5% Progressive, 22.5% Traditionalist (Strong Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Green Liberalism sits 38.7 points above it. 103 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 53.7% Technology, 46.3% Biology (Balanced). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Green Liberalism, the 3.7-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Green Liberalism sits 3.8 points below it. 225 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles
Liberalism
96.4% compatibility
Progressive Liberalism
94.6% compatibility
Egoist Anarchism
94.3% compatibility
Ordoliberalism
93.8% compatibility
Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism
93.7% compatibility
Neoliberalism
93% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest countries & regions
Closest political figures
Associated references
Got Green Liberalism on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Green Liberalism on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Green Liberalism.
Which ideology is closest to Green Liberalism?
Liberalism has 96.4% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Green Liberalism?
Representation is among the furthest from the center: 81.2% Democracy and 18.8% Autocracy. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.







