Anarchist

Geoanarchism

Synthesis of anarchism and Georgism that rejects the state but treats land and natural resources as commons, defending that their rent be shared by the whole community in a free and egalitarian way.

I want to abolish the state and treat land as a common good, freely sharing its rent across the whole community.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 98.8%1.2% Unitary
Democracy 90%10% Autocracy
Security 6.2%93.8% Liberty
Assimilation 12.5%87.5% Multiculturalism
Militarist 2.5%97.5% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 91.2%8.8% Nationalist
Public 72.5%27.5% Private
Planning 20%80% Free market
Protectionism 22.5%77.5% Globalism
Irreligious 88.8%11.2% Religious
Progressive 86.2%13.8% Traditionalist
Technology 33.8%66.2% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

61.3pt

Structure

98.8% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.

Where should public power live?

48.8pt

Power

6.2% Security, compared with the ideology catalog’s 55% median.

How far should the state reach into everyday life?

43.7pt

Morality

86.2% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.

Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 98.8% Federal, 1.2% Unitary (Very strong Federal); Representation: 90% Democracy, 10% Autocracy (Very strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Geoanarchism sits 32.5 points above it. 44 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 6.2% Security, 93.8% Liberty (Very strong Liberty); Immigration: 12.5% Assimilation, 87.5% Multiculturalism (Very strong Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Geoanarchism sits 52.6 points below it. 62 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 2.5% Militarist, 97.5% Pacifist (Very strong Pacifist); Intervention: 91.2% Non-interventionist, 8.8% Nationalist (Very strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Geoanarchism sits 42.4 points above it. 28 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 72.5% Public, 27.5% Private (Strong Public); Control: 20% Planning, 80% Free market (Strong Free market); Trade: 22.5% Protectionism, 77.5% Globalism (Strong Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Geoanarchism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Geoanarchism sits 19.3 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 88.8% Irreligious, 11.2% Religious (Very strong Irreligious); Morality: 86.2% Progressive, 13.8% Traditionalist (Strong Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Geoanarchism sits 47.4 points above it. 103 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 33.8% Technology, 66.2% Biology (Leaning Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Geoanarchism, the 16.2-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Geoanarchism sits 23.7 points below it. 117 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

At the other end of the catalog

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Geoanarchism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Geoanarchism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Geoanarchism.

Which ideology is closest to Geoanarchism?

Anarchism has 95.5% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Geoanarchism?

Structure is among the furthest from the center: 98.8% Federal and 1.2% Unitary. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test