Right

Mercantilism

Doctrine combining free enterprise and competition in the domestic market with an external tariff wall, subsidies for infant industry, a national bank, public infrastructure and trade surplus as a source of national power.

I want free competition at home protected by an external tariff wall, with a national bank and subsidies for infant industry generating a surplus.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 23.8%76.2% Unitary
Democracy 42.5%57.5% Autocracy
Security 63.7%36.3% Liberty
Assimilation 66.2%33.8% Multiculturalism
Militarist 75%25% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 23.8%76.2% Nationalist
Public 38.8%61.2% Private
Planning 48.8%51.2% Free market
Protectionism 78.8%21.2% Globalism
Irreligious 55%45% Religious
Progressive 32.5%67.5% Traditionalist
Technology 70%30% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

29.8pt

Diplomacy

75% Militarist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 45.25% median.

When is armed force an appropriate political instrument?

28.7pt

Intervention

23.8% Non-interventionist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 52.5% median.

How assertively should a state project its interests abroad?

18.7pt

Economy

38.8% Public, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.5% median.

Who should own productive assets and provide essential services?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 23.8% Federal, 76.2% Unitary (Strong Unitary); Representation: 42.5% Democracy, 57.5% Autocracy (Leaning Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Mercantilism sits 15.0 points below it. 99 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 63.7% Security, 36.3% Liberty (Leaning Security); Immigration: 66.2% Assimilation, 33.8% Multiculturalism (Leaning Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Mercantilism sits 4.9 points above it. 175 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 75% Militarist, 25% Pacifist (Strong Militarist); Intervention: 23.8% Non-interventionist, 76.2% Nationalist (Strong Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Mercantilism sits 25.0 points below it. 144 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 38.8% Public, 61.2% Private (Leaning Private); Control: 48.8% Planning, 51.2% Free market (Balanced); Trade: 78.8% Protectionism, 21.2% Globalism (Strong Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Mercantilism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Mercantilism sits 14.4 points below it. 179 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 55% Irreligious, 45% Religious (Balanced); Morality: 32.5% Progressive, 67.5% Traditionalist (Leaning Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Mercantilism sits 6.3 points below it. 197 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 70% Technology, 30% Biology (Leaning Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Mercantilism, the 20.0-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Mercantilism sits 12.5 points above it. 299 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Mercantilism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Mercantilism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Mercantilism.

Which ideology is closest to Mercantilism?

Nationalism has 96.9% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Mercantilism?

Trade is among the furthest from the center: 78.8% Protectionism and 21.2% Globalism. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test