Center

Radical Centrism

Centrism taken to its limit: it refuses any leaning on principle and seeks exact equidistance between every pole, from economics to morality, treating each political axis as a balance point to be preserved.

I want a society that takes no side, power that never tilts toward any pole, and an economy weighing state and market exactly equally.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 50%50% Unitary
Democracy 50%50% Autocracy
Security 50%50% Liberty
Assimilation 50%50% Multiculturalism
Militarist 50%50% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 50%50% Nationalist
Public 50%50% Private
Planning 50%50% Free market
Protectionism 50%50% Globalism
Irreligious 50%50% Religious
Progressive 50%50% Traditionalist
Technology 50%50% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

12.5pt

Structure

50% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.

Where should public power live?

12.5pt

Control

50% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.

How should economic activity be coordinated?

11.7pt

Trade

50% Protectionism, compared with the ideology catalog’s 61.7% median.

How open should the economy be to international exchange?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 50% Federal, 50% Unitary (Balanced); Representation: 50% Democracy, 50% Autocracy (Balanced). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Radical Centrism sits 7.5 points below it. 80 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 50% Security, 50% Liberty (Balanced); Immigration: 50% Assimilation, 50% Multiculturalism (Balanced). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Radical Centrism sits 8.8 points below it. 128 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 50% Militarist, 50% Pacifist (Balanced); Intervention: 50% Non-interventionist, 50% Nationalist (Balanced). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Radical Centrism sits 1.2 points above it. 167 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 50% Public, 50% Private (Balanced); Control: 50% Planning, 50% Free market (Balanced); Trade: 50% Protectionism, 50% Globalism (Balanced). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Radical Centrism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Radical Centrism sits 3.2 points below it. 207 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 50% Irreligious, 50% Religious (Balanced); Morality: 50% Progressive, 50% Traditionalist (Balanced). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Radical Centrism sits 11.2 points above it. 107 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 50% Technology, 50% Biology (Balanced). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Radical Centrism, the 0.0-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Radical Centrism sits 7.5 points below it. 225 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Radical Centrism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Radical Centrism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Radical Centrism.

Which ideology is closest to Radical Centrism?

Pragmatism has 92.3% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Radical Centrism?

Structure is among the furthest from the center: 50% Federal and 50% Unitary. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test