Anarchist

Social Libertarianism

Left-libertarian branch that unites broad individual freedom with collective or shared ownership of resources, defending autonomy, cooperation, and the rejection of both the authoritarian state and capital.

I want autonomous communities of shared property, without state or capital, uniting individual freedom and collective cooperation.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 91.2%8.8% Unitary
Democracy 92.5%7.5% Autocracy
Security 5%95% Liberty
Assimilation 7.5%92.5% Multiculturalism
Militarist 5%95% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 92.5%7.5% Nationalist
Public 90%10% Private
Planning 77.5%22.5% Free market
Protectionism 45%55% Globalism
Irreligious 91.2%8.8% Religious
Progressive 88.8%11.2% Traditionalist
Technology 50%50% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

53.7pt

Structure

91.2% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.

Where should public power live?

50.0pt

Power

5% Security, compared with the ideology catalog’s 55% median.

How far should the state reach into everyday life?

46.3pt

Morality

88.8% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.

Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 91.2% Federal, 8.8% Unitary (Very strong Federal); Representation: 92.5% Democracy, 7.5% Autocracy (Very strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Social Libertarianism sits 35.0 points above it. 44 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 5% Security, 95% Liberty (Very strong Liberty); Immigration: 7.5% Assimilation, 92.5% Multiculturalism (Very strong Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Social Libertarianism sits 53.8 points below it. 62 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 5% Militarist, 95% Pacifist (Very strong Pacifist); Intervention: 92.5% Non-interventionist, 7.5% Nationalist (Very strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Social Libertarianism sits 43.7 points above it. 28 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 90% Public, 10% Private (Very strong Public); Control: 77.5% Planning, 22.5% Free market (Strong Planning); Trade: 45% Protectionism, 55% Globalism (Balanced). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Social Libertarianism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Social Libertarianism sits 36.8 points above it. 83 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 91.2% Irreligious, 8.8% Religious (Very strong Irreligious); Morality: 88.8% Progressive, 11.2% Traditionalist (Very strong Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Social Libertarianism sits 50.0 points above it. 21 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 50% Technology, 50% Biology (Balanced). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Social Libertarianism, the 0.0-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Social Libertarianism sits 7.5 points below it. 225 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

At the other end of the catalog

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Social Libertarianism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Social Libertarianism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Social Libertarianism.

Which ideology is closest to Social Libertarianism?

Libertarian Socialism has 99.1% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Social Libertarianism?

Power is among the furthest from the center: 5% Security and 95% Liberty. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test