Philosopher
Nicolas de Condorcet
A French Enlightenment philosopher, Condorcet championed civil rights, legal equality, and women's suffrage, linking political liberalism to universalist reforms and confidence in the progress of human reason.

Image: Unidentified painter / Formerly attributed to Jean-Baptiste Greuze · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons · cropped and resized
Enlightenment philosopher · 1743-1794
Profile is a model built from 240 answers simulated in character; not a statement by the person.
Compare your own views01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
34.2pt
Trade
27.5% Protectionism, compared with the ideology catalog’s 61.7% median.
How open should the economy be to international exchange?
29.3pt
Religion
87.5% Irreligious, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.2% median.
What place should religion have in individual and public life?
28.8pt
Morality
71.3% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.
Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 28.7% Federal, 71.3% Unitary (Leaning Unitary); Representation: 83.8% Democracy, 16.2% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Nicolas de Condorcet sits 26.3 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 28.7% Security, 71.3% Liberty (Leaning Liberty); Immigration: 27.5% Assimilation, 72.5% Multiculturalism (Strong Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Nicolas de Condorcet sits 30.1 points below it. 151 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 27.5% Militarist, 72.5% Pacifist (Strong Pacifist); Intervention: 67.5% Non-interventionist, 32.5% Nationalist (Leaning Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Nicolas de Condorcet sits 18.7 points above it. 203 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 53.8% Public, 46.2% Private (Balanced); Control: 42.5% Planning, 57.5% Free market (Leaning Free market); Trade: 27.5% Protectionism, 72.5% Globalism (Strong Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Nicolas de Condorcet depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Nicolas de Condorcet sits 0.6 points above it. 207 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 87.5% Irreligious, 12.5% Religious (Very strong Irreligious); Morality: 71.3% Progressive, 28.7% Traditionalist (Leaning Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Nicolas de Condorcet sits 32.5 points above it. 151 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 76.3% Technology, 23.7% Biology (Strong Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Nicolas de Condorcet, the 26.3-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Nicolas de Condorcet sits 18.8 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles

Sam Altman
97.7% compatibility

Ray Kurzweil
96.4% compatibility

Alan Turing
95.4% compatibility

Bill Gates
94.9% compatibility

Thomas Paine
94.5% compatibility

Jensen Huang
93.8% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest ideologies
Closest countries & regions
Three views of compatibility
Political
Progressive Liberalism
96%
12 axes considered
Social
Green Liberalism
96.3%
9 axes considered
Economic
Nordic Social Democracy
99.6%
3 axes considered
Further reading
1795
Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind
Find the book ↗Got Nicolas de Condorcet on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Nicolas de Condorcet on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Nicolas de Condorcet.
Which ideology is closest to Nicolas de Condorcet?
Progressive Liberalism has 96% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Nicolas de Condorcet?
Religion is among the furthest from the center: 87.5% Irreligious and 12.5% Religious. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.



