Philosopher

Nicolas de Condorcet

A French Enlightenment philosopher, Condorcet championed civil rights, legal equality, and women's suffrage, linking political liberalism to universalist reforms and confidence in the progress of human reason.

Enlightenment philosopher · 1743-1794

Profile is a model built from 240 answers simulated in character; not a statement by the person.

Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 28.7%71.3% Unitary
Democracy 83.8%16.2% Autocracy
Security 28.7%71.3% Liberty
Assimilation 27.5%72.5% Multiculturalism
Militarist 27.5%72.5% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 67.5%32.5% Nationalist
Public 53.8%46.2% Private
Planning 42.5%57.5% Free market
Protectionism 27.5%72.5% Globalism
Irreligious 87.5%12.5% Religious
Progressive 71.3%28.7% Traditionalist
Technology 76.3%23.7% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

34.2pt

Trade

27.5% Protectionism, compared with the ideology catalog’s 61.7% median.

How open should the economy be to international exchange?

29.3pt

Religion

87.5% Irreligious, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.2% median.

What place should religion have in individual and public life?

28.8pt

Morality

71.3% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.

Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 28.7% Federal, 71.3% Unitary (Leaning Unitary); Representation: 83.8% Democracy, 16.2% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Nicolas de Condorcet sits 26.3 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 28.7% Security, 71.3% Liberty (Leaning Liberty); Immigration: 27.5% Assimilation, 72.5% Multiculturalism (Strong Multiculturalism). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Nicolas de Condorcet sits 30.1 points below it. 151 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 27.5% Militarist, 72.5% Pacifist (Strong Pacifist); Intervention: 67.5% Non-interventionist, 32.5% Nationalist (Leaning Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Nicolas de Condorcet sits 18.7 points above it. 203 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 53.8% Public, 46.2% Private (Balanced); Control: 42.5% Planning, 57.5% Free market (Leaning Free market); Trade: 27.5% Protectionism, 72.5% Globalism (Strong Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Nicolas de Condorcet depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Nicolas de Condorcet sits 0.6 points above it. 207 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 87.5% Irreligious, 12.5% Religious (Very strong Irreligious); Morality: 71.3% Progressive, 28.7% Traditionalist (Leaning Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Nicolas de Condorcet sits 32.5 points above it. 151 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 76.3% Technology, 23.7% Biology (Strong Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Nicolas de Condorcet, the 26.3-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Nicolas de Condorcet sits 18.8 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest ideologies

Closest countries & regions

Three views of compatibility

Further reading

1795

Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind

Find the book ↗

Got Nicolas de Condorcet on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Nicolas de Condorcet on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Nicolas de Condorcet.

Which ideology is closest to Nicolas de Condorcet?

Progressive Liberalism has 96% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Nicolas de Condorcet?

Religion is among the furthest from the center: 87.5% Irreligious and 12.5% Religious. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test