Political leader
Pericles
Athenian statesman and general, Pericles led Athens through its democratic and cultural golden age, expanded popular participation in institutions, funded the Parthenon with the Delian League's treasury, and led the city into the Peloponnesian War.

Image: Copy of Kresilas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons · cropped and resized
Athenian statesman · 495–429 BC
Profile is a model built from 240 answers simulated in character; not a statement by the person.
Compare your own views01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
33.7pt
Intervention
18.8% Non-interventionist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 52.5% median.
How assertively should a state project its interests abroad?
32.8pt
Immigration
82.5% Assimilation, compared with the ideology catalog’s 49.75% median.
How should a society approach migration and cultural difference?
29.8pt
Diplomacy
75% Militarist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 45.25% median.
When is armed force an appropriate political instrument?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 23.8% Federal, 76.2% Unitary (Strong Unitary); Representation: 77.5% Democracy, 22.5% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Pericles sits 20.0 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 67.5% Security, 32.5% Liberty (Leaning Security); Immigration: 82.5% Assimilation, 17.5% Multiculturalism (Strong Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Pericles sits 8.7 points above it. 175 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 75% Militarist, 25% Pacifist (Strong Militarist); Intervention: 18.8% Non-interventionist, 81.2% Nationalist (Strong Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Pericles sits 30.0 points below it. 144 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 62.5% Public, 37.5% Private (Leaning Public); Control: 72.5% Planning, 27.5% Free market (Strong Planning); Trade: 38.8% Protectionism, 61.2% Globalism (Leaning Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Pericles depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Pericles sits 9.3 points above it. 166 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 48.8% Irreligious, 51.2% Religious (Balanced); Morality: 40% Progressive, 60% Traditionalist (Leaning Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Pericles sits 1.2 points above it. 197 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 76.2% Technology, 23.8% Biology (Strong Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Pericles, the 26.2-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Pericles sits 18.7 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles

David Ben-Gurion
95.5% compatibility

Theodore Roosevelt
92.5% compatibility

Lyndon B. Johnson
91.8% compatibility

Franklin D. Roosevelt
91.6% compatibility

Ze'ev Jabotinsky
90.5% compatibility

Niccolò Machiavelli
89.9% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest ideologies
Closest countries & regions
Three views of compatibility
Political
Zionism
96.3%
12 axes considered
Social
Zionism
94.6%
9 axes considered
Economic
Keynesian Liberalism
99%
3 axes considered
Got Pericles on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Pericles on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Pericles.
Which ideology is closest to Pericles?
Zionism has 96.3% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Pericles?
Immigration is among the furthest from the center: 82.5% Assimilation and 17.5% Multiculturalism. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.



