Far-Right
Ethnic Nationalism
Conception that defines the nation by common origin, language, and ancestry, advocating a state of the dominant ethnicity and the preservation of its identity, with a tendency to exclude minorities and immigrants from the national body.
I want a state of my own ethnicity, united by common blood, language and ancestry, preserving its identity against minorities and immigrants.Compare your own views
01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
45.3pt
Immigration
95% Assimilation, compared with the ideology catalog’s 49.75% median.
How should a society approach migration and cultural difference?
43.2pt
Religion
15% Irreligious, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.2% median.
What place should religion have in individual and public life?
41.3pt
Representation
17.5% Democracy, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.8% median.
Who should govern, and how should they be accountable?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 11.2% Federal, 88.8% Unitary (Very strong Unitary); Representation: 17.5% Democracy, 82.5% Autocracy (Strong Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Ethnic Nationalism sits 40.0 points below it. 156 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 87.5% Security, 12.5% Liberty (Very strong Security); Immigration: 95% Assimilation, 5% Multiculturalism (Very strong Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Ethnic Nationalism sits 28.7 points above it. 95 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 78.8% Militarist, 21.2% Pacifist (Strong Militarist); Intervention: 31.2% Non-interventionist, 68.8% Nationalist (Leaning Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Ethnic Nationalism sits 17.6 points below it. 187 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 46.2% Public, 53.8% Private (Balanced); Control: 75% Planning, 25% Free market (Strong Planning); Trade: 88.8% Protectionism, 11.2% Globalism (Very strong Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Ethnic Nationalism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Ethnic Nationalism sits 7.0 points below it. 207 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 15% Irreligious, 85% Religious (Strong Religious); Morality: 10% Progressive, 90% Traditionalist (Very strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Ethnic Nationalism sits 28.8 points below it. 116 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 60% Technology, 40% Biology (Leaning Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Ethnic Nationalism, the 10.0-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Ethnic Nationalism sits 2.5 points above it. 299 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles
Authoritarian Conservatism
98.6% compatibility
Religious Fundamentalism
98.5% compatibility
National Syndicalism
98.5% compatibility
Absolute Monarchism
97.5% compatibility
National Capitalism
97.4% compatibility
Brazilian Integralism
96.6% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest countries & regions
Closest political figures
Associated references
Got Ethnic Nationalism on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Ethnic Nationalism on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Ethnic Nationalism.
Which ideology is closest to Ethnic Nationalism?
Authoritarian Conservatism has 98.6% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Ethnic Nationalism?
Immigration is among the furthest from the center: 95% Assimilation and 5% Multiculturalism. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.







