Left
State Developmentalism
Model in which the state directs industrialization and economic growth through planning, public investment, and industrial protection, seeking to overcome the nation's backwardness and external dependence.
I want a state that drives industrialization through plans and public investment, protecting industry against external dependence.Compare your own views
01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
31.3pt
Representation
27.5% Democracy, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.8% median.
Who should govern, and how should they be accountable?
28.7pt
Control
91.2% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.
How should economic activity be coordinated?
26.3pt
Morality
68.8% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.
Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 12.5% Federal, 87.5% Unitary (Very strong Unitary); Representation: 27.5% Democracy, 72.5% Autocracy (Strong Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; State Developmentalism sits 30.0 points below it. 156 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 78.8% Security, 21.2% Liberty (Strong Security); Immigration: 47.5% Assimilation, 52.5% Multiculturalism (Balanced). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; State Developmentalism sits 20.0 points above it. 179 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 43.8% Militarist, 56.2% Pacifist (Balanced); Intervention: 47.5% Non-interventionist, 52.5% Nationalist (Balanced). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; State Developmentalism sits 1.3 points below it. 167 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 55% Public, 45% Private (Balanced); Control: 91.2% Planning, 8.8% Free market (Very strong Planning); Trade: 76.2% Protectionism, 23.8% Globalism (Strong Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of State Developmentalism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; State Developmentalism sits 1.8 points above it. 207 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 81.2% Irreligious, 18.8% Religious (Strong Irreligious); Morality: 68.8% Progressive, 31.2% Traditionalist (Leaning Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; State Developmentalism sits 30.0 points above it. 151 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 78.8% Technology, 21.2% Biology (Strong Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For State Developmentalism, the 28.8-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; State Developmentalism sits 21.3 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles
Positivism
96.4% compatibility
Authoritarian Progressivism
93.8% compatibility
State Socialism
92.1% compatibility
Vietnamese Socialism
91.4% compatibility
Kemalist Nationalism
91.1% compatibility
Cuban Socialism
90.8% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest countries & regions
Closest political figures
Associated references
Got State Developmentalism on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting State Developmentalism on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with State Developmentalism.
Which ideology is closest to State Developmentalism?
Positivism has 96.4% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for State Developmentalism?
Control is among the furthest from the center: 91.2% Planning and 8.8% Free market. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.







