Intellectual
Irving Kristol
Considered the godfather of neoconservatism, Kristol united free markets, traditional values, and an interventionist foreign policy, shaping the American intellectual right of the second half of the 20th century.

Image: Unknown author Unknown author · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons · cropped and resized
Intellectual · 1920–2009
Profile is a model built from 240 answers simulated in character; not a statement by the person.
Compare your own views01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
39.8pt
Diplomacy
85% Militarist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 45.25% median.
When is armed force an appropriate political instrument?
37.5pt
Control
25% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.
How should economic activity be coordinated?
36.2pt
Intervention
16.3% Non-interventionist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 52.5% median.
How assertively should a state project its interests abroad?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 51.2% Federal, 48.8% Unitary (Balanced); Representation: 57.5% Democracy, 42.5% Autocracy (Leaning Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Irving Kristol sits 0.0 points above it. 124 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 67.5% Security, 32.5% Liberty (Leaning Security); Immigration: 71.3% Assimilation, 28.7% Multiculturalism (Leaning Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Irving Kristol sits 8.7 points above it. 175 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 85% Militarist, 15% Pacifist (Strong Militarist); Intervention: 16.3% Non-interventionist, 83.7% Nationalist (Strong Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Irving Kristol sits 32.5 points below it. 144 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 28.7% Public, 71.3% Private (Leaning Private); Control: 25% Planning, 75% Free market (Strong Free market); Trade: 30% Protectionism, 70% Globalism (Leaning Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Irving Kristol depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Irving Kristol sits 24.5 points below it. 179 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 26.3% Irreligious, 73.7% Religious (Strong Religious); Morality: 15% Progressive, 85% Traditionalist (Strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Irving Kristol sits 23.8 points below it. 182 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 57.5% Technology, 42.5% Biology (Leaning Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Irving Kristol, the 7.5-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Irving Kristol sits 0.0 points above it. 299 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles

George W. Bush
96.6% compatibility

Edmund Burke
96.4% compatibility

William F. Buckley Jr.
95.7% compatibility

Jair Bolsonaro
95.6% compatibility

Friedrich Merz
95.4% compatibility

José Antonio Kast
95% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest ideologies
Closest countries & regions
Three views of compatibility
Political
National Liberalism
95.9%
12 axes considered
Social
National Liberalism
98.6%
9 axes considered
Economic
Right-Wing Accelerationism
98.6%
3 axes considered
Further reading
1995
Neoconservatism: The Autobiography of an Idea
Find the book ↗Got Irving Kristol on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Irving Kristol on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Irving Kristol.
Which ideology is closest to Irving Kristol?
National Liberalism has 95.9% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Irving Kristol?
Diplomacy is among the furthest from the center: 85% Militarist and 15% Pacifist. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.



