Intellectual

Irving Kristol

Considered the godfather of neoconservatism, Kristol united free markets, traditional values, and an interventionist foreign policy, shaping the American intellectual right of the second half of the 20th century.

Portrait of Irving Kristol

Image: Unknown author Unknown author · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons · cropped and resized

Intellectual · 1920–2009

Profile is a model built from 240 answers simulated in character; not a statement by the person.

Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 51.2%48.8% Unitary
Democracy 57.5%42.5% Autocracy
Security 67.5%32.5% Liberty
Assimilation 71.3%28.7% Multiculturalism
Militarist 85%15% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 16.3%83.7% Nationalist
Public 28.7%71.3% Private
Planning 25%75% Free market
Protectionism 30%70% Globalism
Irreligious 26.3%73.7% Religious
Progressive 15%85% Traditionalist
Technology 57.5%42.5% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

39.8pt

Diplomacy

85% Militarist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 45.25% median.

When is armed force an appropriate political instrument?

37.5pt

Control

25% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.

How should economic activity be coordinated?

36.2pt

Intervention

16.3% Non-interventionist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 52.5% median.

How assertively should a state project its interests abroad?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 51.2% Federal, 48.8% Unitary (Balanced); Representation: 57.5% Democracy, 42.5% Autocracy (Leaning Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Irving Kristol sits 0.0 points above it. 124 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 67.5% Security, 32.5% Liberty (Leaning Security); Immigration: 71.3% Assimilation, 28.7% Multiculturalism (Leaning Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Irving Kristol sits 8.7 points above it. 175 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 85% Militarist, 15% Pacifist (Strong Militarist); Intervention: 16.3% Non-interventionist, 83.7% Nationalist (Strong Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Irving Kristol sits 32.5 points below it. 144 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 28.7% Public, 71.3% Private (Leaning Private); Control: 25% Planning, 75% Free market (Strong Free market); Trade: 30% Protectionism, 70% Globalism (Leaning Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Irving Kristol depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Irving Kristol sits 24.5 points below it. 179 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 26.3% Irreligious, 73.7% Religious (Strong Religious); Morality: 15% Progressive, 85% Traditionalist (Strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Irving Kristol sits 23.8 points below it. 182 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 57.5% Technology, 42.5% Biology (Leaning Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Irving Kristol, the 7.5-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Irving Kristol sits 0.0 points above it. 299 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

At the other end of the catalog

Closest ideologies

Closest countries & regions

Three views of compatibility

Further reading

Got Irving Kristol on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Irving Kristol on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Irving Kristol.

Which ideology is closest to Irving Kristol?

National Liberalism has 95.9% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Irving Kristol?

Diplomacy is among the furthest from the center: 85% Militarist and 15% Pacifist. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test