Theorist
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon
A French philosopher, Proudhon was the first to declare himself an anarchist and formulated mutualism, defending fair exchange, free credit, and use-based property, with the famous phrase that property is theft.

Image: Gustave Courbet · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons · cropped and resized
Philosopher · 1809–1865
Profile is a model built from 240 answers simulated in character; not a statement by the person.
Compare your own views01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
58.7pt
Structure
96.2% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.
Where should public power live?
41.2pt
Power
13.8% Security, compared with the ideology catalog’s 55% median.
How far should the state reach into everyday life?
28.7pt
Intervention
81.2% Non-interventionist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 52.5% median.
How assertively should a state project its interests abroad?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 96.2% Federal, 3.8% Unitary (Very strong Federal); Representation: 82.5% Democracy, 17.5% Autocracy (Strong Democracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Pierre-Joseph Proudhon sits 25.0 points above it. 274 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 13.8% Security, 86.2% Liberty (Strong Liberty); Immigration: 68.8% Assimilation, 31.2% Multiculturalism (Leaning Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Pierre-Joseph Proudhon sits 45.0 points below it. 87 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 17.5% Militarist, 82.5% Pacifist (Strong Pacifist); Intervention: 81.2% Non-interventionist, 18.8% Nationalist (Strong Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Pierre-Joseph Proudhon sits 32.4 points above it. 105 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 72.5% Public, 27.5% Private (Strong Public); Control: 40% Planning, 60% Free market (Leaning Free market); Trade: 70% Protectionism, 30% Globalism (Leaning Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Pierre-Joseph Proudhon sits 19.3 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 80% Irreligious, 20% Religious (Strong Irreligious); Morality: 17.5% Progressive, 82.5% Traditionalist (Strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Pierre-Joseph Proudhon sits 21.3 points below it. 182 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 50% Technology, 50% Biology (Balanced). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, the 0.0-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Pierre-Joseph Proudhon sits 7.5 points below it. 225 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles

Ted Kaczynski
87.4% compatibility

George Orwell
86.2% compatibility

Rui Barbosa
86.2% compatibility

Thomas Jefferson
86.2% compatibility

Ahad Ha'am
85.6% compatibility

Emiliano Zapata
84.6% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest ideologies
Closest countries & regions
Three views of compatibility
Political
Proudhonian Mutualism
100%
12 axes considered
Social
Proudhonian Mutualism
100%
9 axes considered
Economic
Proudhonian Mutualism
100%
3 axes considered
Further reading
1840
What Is Property?
Find the book ↗Got Pierre-Joseph Proudhon on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Pierre-Joseph Proudhon on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Pierre-Joseph Proudhon.
Which ideology is closest to Pierre-Joseph Proudhon?
Proudhonian Mutualism has 100% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Pierre-Joseph Proudhon?
Structure is among the furthest from the center: 96.2% Federal and 3.8% Unitary. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.



