Economist

Roberto Campos

A Brazilian economist and diplomat, Campos served as planning minister under the military regime, created the Central Bank and the housing bank, and became the country's most influential advocate of economic liberalism and privatisation.

Portrait of Roberto Campos

Image: Unknown author Unknown author · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons · cropped and resized

Economist and diplomat · 1917–2001

Profile is a model built from 240 answers simulated in character; not a statement by the person.

Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 35%65% Unitary
Democracy 31.2%68.8% Autocracy
Security 63.7%36.3% Liberty
Assimilation 52.5%47.5% Multiculturalism
Militarist 50%50% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 30%70% Nationalist
Public 21.2%78.8% Private
Planning 22.5%77.5% Free market
Protectionism 22.5%77.5% Globalism
Irreligious 55%45% Religious
Progressive 33.8%66.2% Traditionalist
Technology 75%25% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

40.0pt

Control

22.5% Planning, compared with the ideology catalog’s 62.5% median.

How should economic activity be coordinated?

39.2pt

Trade

22.5% Protectionism, compared with the ideology catalog’s 61.7% median.

How open should the economy be to international exchange?

36.3pt

Economy

21.2% Public, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.5% median.

Who should own productive assets and provide essential services?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 35% Federal, 65% Unitary (Leaning Unitary); Representation: 31.2% Democracy, 68.8% Autocracy (Leaning Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Roberto Campos sits 26.3 points below it. 99 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 63.7% Security, 36.3% Liberty (Leaning Security); Immigration: 52.5% Assimilation, 47.5% Multiculturalism (Balanced). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Roberto Campos sits 4.9 points above it. 175 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 50% Militarist, 50% Pacifist (Balanced); Intervention: 30% Non-interventionist, 70% Nationalist (Leaning Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Roberto Campos sits 18.8 points below it. 187 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 21.2% Public, 78.8% Private (Strong Private); Control: 22.5% Planning, 77.5% Free market (Strong Free market); Trade: 22.5% Protectionism, 77.5% Globalism (Strong Globalism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Roberto Campos depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Roberto Campos sits 32.0 points below it. 74 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 55% Irreligious, 45% Religious (Balanced); Morality: 33.8% Progressive, 66.2% Traditionalist (Leaning Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Roberto Campos sits 5.0 points below it. 197 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 75% Technology, 25% Biology (Strong Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Roberto Campos, the 25.0-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Roberto Campos sits 17.5 points above it. 132 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

At the other end of the catalog

Closest ideologies

Closest countries & regions

Three views of compatibility

Further reading

Got Roberto Campos on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Roberto Campos on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Roberto Campos.

Which ideology is closest to Roberto Campos?

Liberal Technocracy has 96.7% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Roberto Campos?

Economy is among the furthest from the center: 21.2% Public and 78.8% Private. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test