Far-Right

Christian Theocratism

Christian theocratist doctrine that subordinates political power to religious authority, holding that divine law and the Church should govern the state and customs, from medieval and papal ultramontanism to modern reconstructionist projects.

I want a society ruled by divine law, with the Church above the state and customs subordinated to religious authority.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 11.2%88.8% Unitary
Democracy 16.2%83.8% Autocracy
Security 85%15% Liberty
Assimilation 80%20% Multiculturalism
Militarist 68.8%31.2% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 26.2%73.8% Nationalist
Public 57.5%42.5% Private
Planning 66.2%33.8% Free market
Protectionism 78.8%21.2% Globalism
Irreligious 3.8%96.2% Religious
Progressive 7.5%92.5% Traditionalist
Technology 38.8%61.2% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

54.4pt

Religion

3.8% Irreligious, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.2% median.

What place should religion have in individual and public life?

42.6pt

Representation

16.2% Democracy, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.8% median.

Who should govern, and how should they be accountable?

35.0pt

Morality

7.5% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.

Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 11.2% Federal, 88.8% Unitary (Very strong Unitary); Representation: 16.2% Democracy, 83.8% Autocracy (Strong Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Christian Theocratism sits 41.3 points below it. 156 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 85% Security, 15% Liberty (Strong Security); Immigration: 80% Assimilation, 20% Multiculturalism (Strong Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Christian Theocratism sits 26.2 points above it. 179 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 68.8% Militarist, 31.2% Pacifist (Leaning Militarist); Intervention: 26.2% Non-interventionist, 73.8% Nationalist (Strong Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Christian Theocratism sits 22.6 points below it. 144 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 57.5% Public, 42.5% Private (Leaning Public); Control: 66.2% Planning, 33.8% Free market (Leaning Planning); Trade: 78.8% Protectionism, 21.2% Globalism (Strong Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Christian Theocratism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Christian Theocratism sits 4.3 points above it. 166 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 3.8% Irreligious, 96.2% Religious (Very strong Religious); Morality: 7.5% Progressive, 92.5% Traditionalist (Very strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Christian Theocratism sits 31.3 points below it. 116 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 38.8% Technology, 61.2% Biology (Leaning Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Christian Theocratism, the 11.2-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Christian Theocratism sits 18.7 points below it. 117 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Christian Theocratism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Christian Theocratism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Christian Theocratism.

Which ideology is closest to Christian Theocratism?

Brazilian Integralism has 99.3% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Christian Theocratism?

Religion is among the furthest from the center: 3.8% Irreligious and 96.2% Religious. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test