Far-Right

Eco-Fascism

Current that fuses radical ecology, authoritarianism, and organic nationalism, defending population control, coercive environmental preservation, and the subordination of individual freedoms to the survival of the national community.

I want an organic national community that imposes population control and coercive environmental preservation above individual freedoms.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 52.5%47.5% Unitary
Democracy 13.8%86.2% Autocracy
Security 75%25% Liberty
Assimilation 95%5% Multiculturalism
Militarist 70%30% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 45%55% Nationalist
Public 57.5%42.5% Private
Planning 75%25% Free market
Protectionism 91.2%8.8% Globalism
Irreligious 41.2%58.8% Religious
Progressive 20%80% Traditionalist
Technology 11.2%88.8% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

46.7pt

Technology

11.2% Technology, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.9% median.

How readily should technology reshape human life?

45.3pt

Immigration

95% Assimilation, compared with the ideology catalog’s 49.75% median.

How should a society approach migration and cultural difference?

45.0pt

Representation

13.8% Democracy, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.8% median.

Who should govern, and how should they be accountable?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 52.5% Federal, 47.5% Unitary (Balanced); Representation: 13.8% Democracy, 86.2% Autocracy (Strong Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Eco-Fascism sits 43.7 points below it. 156 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 75% Security, 25% Liberty (Strong Security); Immigration: 95% Assimilation, 5% Multiculturalism (Very strong Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Eco-Fascism sits 16.2 points above it. 179 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 70% Militarist, 30% Pacifist (Leaning Militarist); Intervention: 45% Non-interventionist, 55% Nationalist (Balanced). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Eco-Fascism sits 3.8 points below it. 167 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 57.5% Public, 42.5% Private (Leaning Public); Control: 75% Planning, 25% Free market (Strong Planning); Trade: 91.2% Protectionism, 8.8% Globalism (Very strong Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Eco-Fascism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Eco-Fascism sits 4.3 points above it. 166 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 41.2% Irreligious, 58.8% Religious (Leaning Religious); Morality: 20% Progressive, 80% Traditionalist (Strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Eco-Fascism sits 18.8 points below it. 182 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 11.2% Technology, 88.8% Biology (Very strong Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Eco-Fascism, the 38.8-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Eco-Fascism sits 46.3 points below it. 25 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Eco-Fascism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Eco-Fascism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Eco-Fascism.

Which ideology is closest to Eco-Fascism?

Carlist Traditionalism has 91.6% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Eco-Fascism?

Immigration is among the furthest from the center: 95% Assimilation and 5% Multiculturalism. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test