Third Position

Eurasianism

Russian geopolitical current that sees Eurasia as a distinct civilization and proposes a Moscow-led continental bloc, with regional autonomy and shared strategic command, against Atlanticism and US hegemony.

I want Eurasian peoples autonomous in their traditions, united under Moscow's strategic direction, with economic sovereignty and planned essential industries.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 60%40% Unitary
Democracy 32.5%67.5% Autocracy
Security 68.8%31.2% Liberty
Assimilation 63.7%36.3% Multiculturalism
Militarist 76.2%23.8% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 20%80% Nationalist
Public 68.8%31.2% Private
Planning 73.8%26.2% Free market
Protectionism 70%30% Globalism
Irreligious 11.2%88.8% Religious
Progressive 21.2%78.8% Traditionalist
Technology 28.7%71.3% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

47.0pt

Religion

11.2% Irreligious, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.2% median.

What place should religion have in individual and public life?

32.5pt

Intervention

20% Non-interventionist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 52.5% median.

How assertively should a state project its interests abroad?

31.0pt

Diplomacy

76.2% Militarist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 45.25% median.

When is armed force an appropriate political instrument?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 60% Federal, 40% Unitary (Leaning Federal); Representation: 32.5% Democracy, 67.5% Autocracy (Leaning Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Eurasianism sits 25.0 points below it. 99 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 68.8% Security, 31.2% Liberty (Leaning Security); Immigration: 63.7% Assimilation, 36.3% Multiculturalism (Leaning Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Eurasianism sits 10.0 points above it. 175 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 76.2% Militarist, 23.8% Pacifist (Strong Militarist); Intervention: 20% Non-interventionist, 80% Nationalist (Strong Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Eurasianism sits 28.8 points below it. 144 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 68.8% Public, 31.2% Private (Leaning Public); Control: 73.8% Planning, 26.2% Free market (Strong Planning); Trade: 70% Protectionism, 30% Globalism (Leaning Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Eurasianism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Eurasianism sits 15.6 points above it. 166 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 11.2% Irreligious, 88.8% Religious (Very strong Religious); Morality: 21.2% Progressive, 78.8% Traditionalist (Strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Eurasianism sits 17.6 points below it. 182 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 28.7% Technology, 71.3% Biology (Leaning Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Eurasianism, the 21.3-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Eurasianism sits 28.8 points below it. 117 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Eurasianism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Eurasianism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Eurasianism.

Which ideology is closest to Eurasianism?

Carlist Traditionalism has 96% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Eurasianism?

Religion is among the furthest from the center: 11.2% Irreligious and 88.8% Religious. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test