Third Position
Eurasianism
Russian geopolitical current that sees Eurasia as a distinct civilization and proposes a Moscow-led continental bloc, with regional autonomy and shared strategic command, against Atlanticism and US hegemony.
I want Eurasian peoples autonomous in their traditions, united under Moscow's strategic direction, with economic sovereignty and planned essential industries.Compare your own views
01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
47.0pt
Religion
11.2% Irreligious, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.2% median.
What place should religion have in individual and public life?
32.5pt
Intervention
20% Non-interventionist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 52.5% median.
How assertively should a state project its interests abroad?
31.0pt
Diplomacy
76.2% Militarist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 45.25% median.
When is armed force an appropriate political instrument?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 60% Federal, 40% Unitary (Leaning Federal); Representation: 32.5% Democracy, 67.5% Autocracy (Leaning Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Eurasianism sits 25.0 points below it. 99 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 68.8% Security, 31.2% Liberty (Leaning Security); Immigration: 63.7% Assimilation, 36.3% Multiculturalism (Leaning Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Eurasianism sits 10.0 points above it. 175 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 76.2% Militarist, 23.8% Pacifist (Strong Militarist); Intervention: 20% Non-interventionist, 80% Nationalist (Strong Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Eurasianism sits 28.8 points below it. 144 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 68.8% Public, 31.2% Private (Leaning Public); Control: 73.8% Planning, 26.2% Free market (Strong Planning); Trade: 70% Protectionism, 30% Globalism (Leaning Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Eurasianism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Eurasianism sits 15.6 points above it. 166 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 11.2% Irreligious, 88.8% Religious (Very strong Religious); Morality: 21.2% Progressive, 78.8% Traditionalist (Strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Eurasianism sits 17.6 points below it. 182 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 28.7% Technology, 71.3% Biology (Leaning Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Eurasianism, the 21.3-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Eurasianism sits 28.8 points below it. 117 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles
Carlist Traditionalism
96% compatibility
Pan-Islamism
92.6% compatibility
Christian Socialism
92.4% compatibility
Federalist Imperialism
92.3% compatibility
Jewish Theocracy
91.4% compatibility
Strasserist Socialism
90.5% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest countries & regions
Closest political figures
Associated references
Got Eurasianism on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Eurasianism on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Eurasianism.
Which ideology is closest to Eurasianism?
Carlist Traditionalism has 96% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Eurasianism?
Religion is among the furthest from the center: 11.2% Irreligious and 88.8% Religious. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.







