Far-Right

Carlist Traditionalism

A Spanish current of counter-revolutionary traditionalism, born in the 19th-century Carlist Wars under the motto God, Fatherland, Fueros and King, advocating a legitimist Catholic monarchy, religious unity, regional fueros and an organic society against liberalism.

I want Catholic Spain under the rightful king, with regional fueros, estate-based cortes and guilds, against liberalism and centralism.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 72%28% Unitary
Democracy 31.7%68.3% Autocracy
Security 61.4%38.6% Liberty
Assimilation 78.9%21.1% Multiculturalism
Militarist 69.5%30.5% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 31.7%68.3% Nationalist
Public 55.5%44.5% Private
Planning 68.3%31.7% Free market
Protectionism 80.4%19.6% Globalism
Irreligious 1%99% Religious
Progressive 7.7%92.3% Traditionalist
Technology 16.9%83.1% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

57.2pt

Religion

1% Irreligious, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.2% median.

What place should religion have in individual and public life?

41.0pt

Technology

16.9% Technology, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.9% median.

How readily should technology reshape human life?

34.8pt

Morality

7.7% Progressive, compared with the ideology catalog’s 42.5% median.

Should social norms emphasize change or continuity?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 72% Federal, 28% Unitary (Leaning Federal); Representation: 31.7% Democracy, 68.3% Autocracy (Leaning Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Carlist Traditionalism sits 25.8 points below it. 99 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 61.4% Security, 38.6% Liberty (Leaning Security); Immigration: 78.9% Assimilation, 21.1% Multiculturalism (Strong Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Carlist Traditionalism sits 2.6 points above it. 175 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 69.5% Militarist, 30.5% Pacifist (Leaning Militarist); Intervention: 31.7% Non-interventionist, 68.3% Nationalist (Leaning Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Carlist Traditionalism sits 17.1 points below it. 187 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 55.5% Public, 44.5% Private (Balanced); Control: 68.3% Planning, 31.7% Free market (Leaning Planning); Trade: 80.4% Protectionism, 19.6% Globalism (Strong Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Carlist Traditionalism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Carlist Traditionalism sits 2.3 points above it. 207 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 1% Irreligious, 99% Religious (Very strong Religious); Morality: 7.7% Progressive, 92.3% Traditionalist (Very strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Carlist Traditionalism sits 31.1 points below it. 116 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 16.9% Technology, 83.1% Biology (Strong Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Carlist Traditionalism, the 33.1-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Carlist Traditionalism sits 40.6 points below it. 60 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Carlist Traditionalism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Carlist Traditionalism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Carlist Traditionalism.

Which ideology is closest to Carlist Traditionalism?

Eurasianism has 96% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Carlist Traditionalism?

Religion is among the furthest from the center: 1% Irreligious and 99% Religious. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test