Philosopher

Martin Heidegger

German philosopher, Heidegger reopened the question of being and criticised modern technology as the uprooting of humanity; he joined the Nazi party in 1933 and became rector of Freiburg, support he never publicly recanted.

Portrait of Martin Heidegger

Image: Willy Pragher · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons · cropped and resized

Philosopher · 1889–1976

Profile is a model built from 240 answers simulated in character; not a statement by the person.

Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 35%65% Unitary
Democracy 17.5%82.5% Autocracy
Security 77.5%22.5% Liberty
Assimilation 86.2%13.8% Multiculturalism
Militarist 75%25% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 38.8%61.2% Nationalist
Public 56.2%43.8% Private
Planning 63.7%36.3% Free market
Protectionism 78.8%21.2% Globalism
Irreligious 37.5%62.5% Religious
Progressive 27.5%72.5% Traditionalist
Technology 10%90% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

47.9pt

Technology

10% Technology, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.9% median.

How readily should technology reshape human life?

41.3pt

Representation

17.5% Democracy, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.8% median.

Who should govern, and how should they be accountable?

36.5pt

Immigration

86.2% Assimilation, compared with the ideology catalog’s 49.75% median.

How should a society approach migration and cultural difference?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 35% Federal, 65% Unitary (Leaning Unitary); Representation: 17.5% Democracy, 82.5% Autocracy (Strong Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Martin Heidegger sits 40.0 points below it. 156 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 77.5% Security, 22.5% Liberty (Strong Security); Immigration: 86.2% Assimilation, 13.8% Multiculturalism (Strong Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Martin Heidegger sits 18.7 points above it. 179 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 75% Militarist, 25% Pacifist (Strong Militarist); Intervention: 38.8% Non-interventionist, 61.2% Nationalist (Leaning Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Martin Heidegger sits 10.0 points below it. 187 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 56.2% Public, 43.8% Private (Balanced); Control: 63.7% Planning, 36.3% Free market (Leaning Planning); Trade: 78.8% Protectionism, 21.2% Globalism (Strong Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Martin Heidegger depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Martin Heidegger sits 3.0 points above it. 207 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 37.5% Irreligious, 62.5% Religious (Leaning Religious); Morality: 27.5% Progressive, 72.5% Traditionalist (Strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Martin Heidegger sits 11.3 points below it. 182 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 10% Technology, 90% Biology (Very strong Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Martin Heidegger, the 40.0-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Martin Heidegger sits 47.5 points below it. 25 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

At the other end of the catalog

Closest ideologies

Closest countries & regions

Three views of compatibility

Further reading

Got Martin Heidegger on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Martin Heidegger on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Martin Heidegger.

Which ideology is closest to Martin Heidegger?

Eco-Fascism has 97.6% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Martin Heidegger?

Technology is among the furthest from the center: 10% Technology and 90% Biology. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test