Far-Right

Feudalism

A medieval order based on personal bonds of vassalage between lord and vassals, with land granted as fiefs, a hereditary warrior nobility, serfs bound to the land, the Church as moral authority, and power fragmented among local lords.

I want lords and vassals bound by fealty, the Church at the center, and each in their estate: those who pray, fight, or till.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 89.9%10.1% Unitary
Democracy 17.4%82.6% Autocracy
Security 76.9%23.1% Liberty
Assimilation 82.5%17.5% Multiculturalism
Militarist 80.2%19.8% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 23.3%76.7% Nationalist
Public 28.1%71.9% Private
Planning 31.4%68.6% Free market
Protectionism 82.8%17.2% Globalism
Irreligious 1%99% Religious
Progressive 4.1%95.9% Traditionalist
Technology 18.2%81.8% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

57.2pt

Religion

1% Irreligious, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.2% median.

What place should religion have in individual and public life?

52.4pt

Structure

89.9% Federal, compared with the ideology catalog’s 37.5% median.

Where should public power live?

41.4pt

Representation

17.4% Democracy, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.8% median.

Who should govern, and how should they be accountable?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 89.9% Federal, 10.1% Unitary (Very strong Federal); Representation: 17.4% Democracy, 82.6% Autocracy (Strong Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Feudalism sits 40.1 points below it. 156 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 76.9% Security, 23.1% Liberty (Strong Security); Immigration: 82.5% Assimilation, 17.5% Multiculturalism (Strong Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Feudalism sits 18.1 points above it. 179 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 80.2% Militarist, 19.8% Pacifist (Strong Militarist); Intervention: 23.3% Non-interventionist, 76.7% Nationalist (Strong Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Feudalism sits 25.5 points below it. 144 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 28.1% Public, 71.9% Private (Leaning Private); Control: 31.4% Planning, 68.6% Free market (Leaning Free market); Trade: 82.8% Protectionism, 17.2% Globalism (Strong Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Feudalism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Feudalism sits 25.1 points below it. 179 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 1% Irreligious, 99% Religious (Very strong Religious); Morality: 4.1% Progressive, 95.9% Traditionalist (Very strong Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Feudalism sits 34.7 points below it. 116 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 18.2% Technology, 81.8% Biology (Strong Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Feudalism, the 31.8-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Feudalism sits 39.3 points below it. 60 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Feudalism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Feudalism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Feudalism.

Which ideology is closest to Feudalism?

Carlist Traditionalism has 90% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Feudalism?

Religion is among the furthest from the center: 1% Irreligious and 99% Religious. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test