Far-Right

Traditionalism

A current of René Guénon and Julius Evola that sees modernity as the decay of a universal spiritual tradition, defending sacred hierarchy, castes, initiatory order and the primacy of spirit over economics and mass politics.

I want a sacred hierarchical order of castes and initiates that puts spirit above money and mass politics, against modernity.
Compare your own views

01 / The profile

Twelve axes, one perspective

How to read the percentages ↗
Federal 70.9%29.1% Unitary
Democracy 17.4%82.6% Autocracy
Security 56.7%43.3% Liberty
Assimilation 52.9%47.1% Multiculturalism
Militarist 67.6%32.4% Pacifist
Non-interventionist 59.8%40.2% Nationalist
Public 53.1%46.9% Private
Planning 55.2%44.8% Free market
Protectionism 81.6%18.4% Globalism
Irreligious 22.2%77.8% Religious
Progressive 28.9%71.1% Traditionalist
Technology 7.5%92.5% Biology

02 / What stands out

Three distinctive positions

50.4pt

Technology

7.5% Technology, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.9% median.

How readily should technology reshape human life?

41.4pt

Representation

17.4% Democracy, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.8% median.

Who should govern, and how should they be accountable?

36.0pt

Religion

22.2% Irreligious, compared with the ideology catalog’s 58.2% median.

What place should religion have in individual and public life?

The profile in detail

Government and accountability. Structure: 70.9% Federal, 29.1% Unitary (Leaning Federal); Representation: 17.4% Democracy, 82.6% Autocracy (Strong Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Traditionalism sits 40.1 points below it. 156 reference profiles share this band.

Civil power and culture. Power: 56.7% Security, 43.3% Liberty (Balanced); Immigration: 52.9% Assimilation, 47.1% Multiculturalism (Balanced). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Traditionalism sits 2.1 points below it. 128 reference profiles share this band.

Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 67.6% Militarist, 32.4% Pacifist (Leaning Militarist); Intervention: 59.8% Non-interventionist, 40.2% Nationalist (Leaning Non-interventionist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Traditionalism sits 11.0 points above it. 203 reference profiles share this band.

Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 53.1% Public, 46.9% Private (Balanced); Control: 55.2% Planning, 44.8% Free market (Balanced); Trade: 81.6% Protectionism, 18.4% Globalism (Strong Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Traditionalism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Traditionalism sits 0.1 points below it. 207 reference profiles share this band.

Belief and social norms. Religion: 22.2% Irreligious, 77.8% Religious (Strong Religious); Morality: 28.9% Progressive, 71.1% Traditionalist (Leaning Traditionalist). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Traditionalism sits 9.9 points below it. 197 reference profiles share this band.

Technology and limits. Technology: 7.5% Technology, 92.5% Biology (Very strong Biology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Traditionalism, the 42.5-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Traditionalism sits 50.0 points below it. 25 reference profiles share this band.

03 / Connections

Nearby profiles

Closest countries & regions

Closest political figures

Associated references

Got Traditionalism on the 12 Axes test?

Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.

Understand your result ↗

Frequently asked questions

What does getting Traditionalism on the test mean?

Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Traditionalism.

Which ideology is closest to Traditionalism?

Aristotelianism has 91.5% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.

Which axis stands out for Traditionalism?

Technology is among the furthest from the center: 7.5% Technology and 92.5% Biology. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.

Your perspective, in detail

Where do your ideas stand?

Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.

Take the 12 Axes test