Third Position
Futurism
Movement of Filippo Marinetti that exalted speed, machines, industry and war as the world's hygiene, preaching nationalism, anticlericalism and a break with the past, and that helped found Italian fascism.
I want a young, fast nation driven by machines and factories, free of priests, kings and museums, forged in war as the world's hygiene.Compare your own views
01 / The profile
Twelve axes, one perspective
02 / What stands out
Three distinctive positions
52.3pt
Diplomacy
97.5% Militarist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 45.25% median.
When is armed force an appropriate political instrument?
42.5pt
Intervention
10% Non-interventionist, compared with the ideology catalog’s 52.5% median.
How assertively should a state project its interests abroad?
34.6pt
Technology
92.5% Technology, compared with the ideology catalog’s 57.9% median.
How readily should technology reshape human life?
The profile in detail
Government and accountability. Structure: 21.2% Federal, 78.8% Unitary (Strong Unitary); Representation: 30% Democracy, 70% Autocracy (Leaning Autocracy). This combination separates where authority is located from how leaders are selected and constrained. It preserves those two choices even when a broad political label does not distinguish them. On Representation, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Democracy; Futurism sits 27.5 points below it. 99 reference profiles share this band.
Civil power and culture. Power: 63.7% Security, 36.3% Liberty (Leaning Security); Immigration: 75% Assimilation, 25% Multiculturalism (Strong Assimilation). The first contrast concerns limits on civil life; the second concerns cultural adaptation and plural identities. Reading them together avoids inferring an immigration position solely from a preference about security. On Power, the 877-profile catalog median is 58.8% Security; Futurism sits 4.9 points above it. 175 reference profiles share this band.
Force and foreign policy. Diplomacy: 97.5% Militarist, 2.5% Pacifist (Very strong Militarist); Intervention: 10% Non-interventionist, 90% Nationalist (Very strong Nationalist). Military capacity and projection of national interests are distinct choices in this model. These coordinates show how the profile combines military means and external objectives, without assuming that they always move together. On Intervention, the 877-profile catalog median is 48.8% Non-interventionist; Futurism sits 38.8 points below it. 43 reference profiles share this band.
Ownership, coordination and trade. Economy: 58.8% Public, 41.2% Private (Leaning Public); Control: 73.8% Planning, 26.2% Free market (Strong Planning); Trade: 78.8% Protectionism, 21.2% Globalism (Strong Protectionism). These ask three different questions: who owns, how activity is coordinated and how the economy engages abroad. The economic profile of Futurism depends on that combination, rather than a single left or right classification. On Economy, the 877-profile catalog median is 53.2% Public; Futurism sits 5.6 points above it. 166 reference profiles share this band.
Belief and social norms. Religion: 90% Irreligious, 10% Religious (Very strong Irreligious); Morality: 67.5% Progressive, 32.5% Traditionalist (Leaning Progressive). The model keeps religious influence separate from continuity in social norms. These values describe the reference profile; they do not assign a religion to someone who receives this match in the quiz. On Morality, the 877-profile catalog median is 38.8% Progressive; Futurism sits 28.7 points above it. 151 reference profiles share this band.
Technology and limits. Technology: 92.5% Technology, 7.5% Biology (Very strong Technology). This adds a perspective on innovation and biological continuity that cannot be inferred directly from the economic coordinates. For Futurism, the 42.5-point distance from the center indicates the intensity of this particular position. On Technology, the 877-profile catalog median is 57.5% Technology; Futurism sits 35.0 points above it. 19 reference profiles share this band.
03 / Connections
Nearby profiles
National Bolshevism (NazBol)
91.7% compatibility
Blanquist Socialism
91.5% compatibility
Ba'athist Socialism
90.4% compatibility
Enlightened Monarchism
87.8% compatibility
Marxism–Leninism
87.6% compatibility
Techno-Fascism
87.1% compatibility
At the other end of the catalog
Closest countries & regions
Closest political figures
Associated references
Got Futurism on the 12 Axes test?
Look at the other nearby profiles and the axes where you differ. A match is a starting point for exploring ideas, rather than a final identity.
Understand your result ↗Frequently asked questions
What does getting Futurism on the test mean?
Your twelve scores are relatively close to this reference profile. A match describes similarity inside the model; it does not imply agreement with every action, policy or belief associated with Futurism.
Which ideology is closest to Futurism?
National Bolshevism (NazBol) has 91.7% compatibility in the catalog. This score combines axis proximity, overall direction, intensity and the largest difference between the profiles.
Which axis stands out for Futurism?
Diplomacy is among the furthest from the center: 97.5% Militarist and 2.5% Pacifist. Read all twelve axes to understand the full combination.
Your perspective, in detail
Where do your ideas stand?
Explore twelve dimensions and discover the combinations that make your perspective your own.






